NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2426/2010

M/S. MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

JANAKRAM DANSENA - Opp.Party(s)

MR. PRASHANT KUMAR & MR. AMIT SINGH

06 Oct 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2426 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 27/03/2009 in Appeal No. 109/2009 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)
1. M/S. MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.2nd Floor, Sadhana House, 507, P.B. Marg, WorliMumbai - 400018Maharashtra ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. JANAKRAM DANSENAR/o. Village Varbhanua, Tehsil KharasiaRaigarhChhattisgarh ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENT
For the Petitioner :MR. PRASHANT KUMAR & MR. AMIT SINGH
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 06 Oct 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          This revision petition has been filed with a delay of 376 days, which is over and above the statutory period of 90 days given for filing the revision petitioner.  Consumer fora are required to decide the cases in a summary manner within given time frame.  Complaint has to be disposed of within 90 days from the date of filing where no evidence is required to be taken and within 150 days where evidence is required to be taken.  The inordinate delay of 376 days cannot be

-2-

condoned without sufficient cause being shown.  The only cause shown for the delay is that the file was moving from table to table to get the permission to file the revision petition.  The delay of each day has to be explained which the petitioner has failed to do.  I am not satisfied with the cause shown for condonation of delay.  Application seeking condonation of delay is dismissed.  Consequently, revision petition is dismissed as barred by time.

 



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT