Punjab

Patiala

CC/19/420

Mangat Ram Arora - Complainant(s)

Versus

Janak Raj Organiser - Opp.Party(s)

Sh P.C Sadrana

04 Sep 2020

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Patiala
Patiala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/19/420
( Date of Filing : 11 Oct 2019 )
 
1. Mangat Ram Arora
R/O 70-A Joginder Nagar Khalsa Collage Road Patiala
Patiala
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Janak Raj Organiser
R/O 5891 Urban Estate Phase-2 Patiala
Patiala
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. J. S. Bhinder PRESIDENT
  Sh. V K Ghulati Member
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 04 Sep 2020
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

PATIALA.

 

                                      Consumer Complaint No. CC 420 of 11.10.2019

                                      Decided on: 4.9.2020

 

Mangat Ram Arora, aged 62 years, retired from Punjab Irrigation Department, S/p Prem Singh & Brij Bala w/o Mangat Ram Arora, Residents of 70-A, Joginder Nagar, Khalsa College Road, Patiala, Aadhar No.3743 6278 4097.

 

                                                                   …………...Complainant

                                      Versus

  1. Janak Raj, Organiser, Akhil Bhartia Guru Shishya Family (Balaji Trust) R/o 5891, Urban Estate, Phase-2, Patiala, Punjab, Mobile No.98140-81250, 98142-21250 email:balaji.real Achin Travel Agent, Sheran Wala Gate, Patiala, Mob:98159-94373.

                                                                   …………Opposite Parties

 

                                      Complaint under Section 12 of the

                                      Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

 

QUORUM

                                      Sh. Jasjit Singh Bhinder, President

                                      Sh.Vinod Kumar Gulati, Member

 

ARGUED BY

                  

For the complainant:     Sh.P.C.Sardana,Advocate

For OPs:                         Ex-parte.

 

 

 

                                     

 ORDER

                                      JASJIT SINGH BHINDER,PRESIDENT

  1. This is the complaint filed by Mangat Ram Arora   (hereinafter referred to as the complainant) against  Janak Raj and another (hereinafter referred to as the OP/s).
  2. Briefly the case of the complainant is that the OPs in connivance with each other are running the business under the garb of religious in many fields like as Putra Prapti, Dhan Prapti, Education Prapti, Age, Arogyata, Lokik sukh (worldly amusement), Moksha and Heaven for the ancestors (forefather) so that their soul must rest in heaven for maintaining peace for forefather as well as in their family.
  3. It is submitted that after seeing the advertisement flex pasted at various places the complainant and his wife ready to visit Gaya for the welfare of their ancestral/forefather (Pitras) as well as their family. The complainants approached OPs and deposited Rs.5000/-as booking charges  for three days  at Gaya, vide receipt No.287 dated 3.8.2019. The complainants also deposited Rs.5000/-  with the OPs for booking of Railway tickets from Ambala Cantt to Gaya and back in Jalianwala Express on 1.8.2019. After receiving the amount the OP No.1 handed over the tickets to the complainant.
  4. It is further submitted that after that one room in hotel Bodh Vilas was booked for residing at Gaya for two guests and the complainants paid Rs.1500/- as hotel booking charges, to the OPs.
  5. It is further submitted that on 20.9.2019, when complainant and his wife boarded the train Jalianwala Express from Ambala Cantt to Gaya , on enroute ticket collector told the complainant that ticket of Brij Bala stand cancelled and he will be penalized as per railways rules being without ticket. On this the complainant shocked and called upon OP No.1 who was at Gaya at that time. He replied that he has not cancelled the ticket. At this the complainant e-mailed to OP No.2 to cancel the ticket from Gaya to Ambala Cantt as they felt embarrassed and depressed badly. Under the compelled circumstances, the wife of the complainant asked for terminated the trip at Saharanpur and on the same night they came back to Patiala.

On 21.9.2019, the complainant visited the office of the OPs and made request for the refund of the amount but the OPs failed to refund any penny to the complainant. The act and conduct of the OPs showed unfair trade practice on their part and also amounts to deficiency in service, which caused mental , physical and financial harassment to the complainant. Hence this complaint with the prayer for giving direction to the OPs to refund the amount of Rs.11,900/- with penal interest; to pay Rs.50,000/- as compensation for causing harassment, mental torture and agony and also to pay Rs.10,000/- as litigation expenses.

  1. Notice of the complaint was duly served upon the OPs.But none appeared on their behalf.  Accordingly, OP No.1 was proceeded against exparte on 27.11.2019 and OP No.2 was proceeded against ex-parte on 26.12.2019. 
  2. In ex-parte evidence the complainant tendered in evidence his affidavit,Ex.CA wherein he has deposed in support of his complaint as he has is avered in the complaint. He has also tendered documents Exs.C1 to C16.
  3. We have heard the ld. counsel for the complainant and have also gone through the record of the case, carefully.
  4. From the perusal of copy of advertisement,Ex.C2, it is evident that OP No.1 in connivance with OP No.2,is  running the business under the garb of religious in many fields like as Putra Prapti, Dhan Prapti, Education Prapti, Age, Arogyata, Lokik sukh (worldly amusement), Moksha and Heaven for the ancestors (forefather).From the copy of receipt,Ex.C3, it is evident that the complainant  has deposited Rs.5000/-. Vide Exs.C4 to C7, he has also paid Rs.5000/- as booking charges  of railway from Ambala Cantt to Gaya  and back. From the message Ex.C12, it is evidence that the complainant has deposited  Rs.1500/-for the booking in the hotel Bodh Vilas. 
  5. From the document/message,Ex.C13, it is clear that the complainant has terminated/cancelled the trip  midway at Saharanpur.  Here it may be stated that the OPs have preferred not to appear and to contest the complaint despite service of notice.
  6. From the perusal of documents placed on record by the complainant, it is cleared that the OPs have committed unfair trade practice and are deficient in their service, which caused mental agony and harassment to the complainant. Accordingly  the complainant is held entitled to Rs.11,500/- (Rs.5000/- as booking charges, Rs.5000/-  for railway booking and Rs.1500/- paid as hotel room charges) alongwith Rs.10,000/- as costs of the complaint for causing mental agony and harassment to him. We order accordingly.  Compliance of the order be made by the  OPs within a period of 45 days from the date of the receipt of the certified copy of this order.

ANNOUNCED

DATED:4.9.2020         

 

                             Vinod Kumar Gulati             Jasjit Singh Bhinder

                                    Member                                       President

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. J. S. Bhinder]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Sh. V K Ghulati]
Member
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.