NCDRC

NCDRC

OP/203/2000

SUBHASH CHAND S/O. LATE SH. BIRBAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

JAIPUR GOLDEN HOSPITAL - Opp.Party(s)

MR. B.S. CHAUHAN

09 Nov 2011

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

NEW DELHI

CONSUMER CASE NO. 203 OF 2000

1. SUBHASH CHAND S/O. LATE SH. BIRBAL R/O. H.NO. 724 POCKET 6 - 2 SECTOR - 02 ROHINI DELHI	...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. JAIPUR GOLDEN HOSPITAL 2 INSTITUTIONAL AREA SECTOR - 03 ROHINI DELHI - 85	...........Opp.Party(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
	HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Complainant :

NEMO

For the Opp.Party :

NEMO

Dated : 09 Nov 2011

ORDER

In Original Petition No.203 of 2000 (Shri Subhash Chand Versus Jaipur Golden Hospital & Ors.), this Commission had held the respondents liable for medical negligence and deficiency of service. Accordingly, a total compensation of Rs.10.5 lakhs with interest at 6% from the date of the complaint, was awarded in favour of the Complainant.   The Complainant has now filed this review petition seeking enhancement of the above mentioned compensation to a sum of Rs.10 crores. This prayer of the petitioner goes well beyond the scope of the review jurisdiction. Under Section 22(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the power of this Commission to review its own orders is limited to the extent to rectification of any error apparent on the face of the record. It does not go beyond. In view of the above, the review petition is rejected, with no order as to costs.

......................J

R. C. JAIN

PRESIDING MEMBER

......................

VINAY KUMAR

MEMBER