NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/371/2013

SDO, UHBVNL - Complainant(s)

Versus

JAIPAL CHAUHAN - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA

21 Oct 2013

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 371 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 01/10/2012 in Appeal No. 783/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. SDO, UHBVNL
SUB DIVISION, KUNDLI
SONEPAT
HARYANA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. JAIPAL CHAUHAN
S/O SHRI BHOOP SINGH, R/O PIAU MANIYARI,TEHSIL
SONEPAT
HARYANA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. Surendra Singh Hooda, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Ms. Richa Sharma, Advocate

Dated : 21 Oct 2013
ORDER

PER JUSTICE J.M. MALIK

 

            Counsel for the parties present.  This case is fully covered Under Section 135 (c ) of the Electricity Act as per Supreme Court’s authority reported in the case of “U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Anis Ahmad” in Civil Appeal No. 5466 of 2012 arising out of SLP (C) No. 35906 of 2011, this Commission has no jurisdiction to try this case.

 Consequently, we accept the revision petition and set aside the orders passed by the Fora below. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Forum/Court for redressal of his grievances.  So far as the limitation is concerned, he can seek help from Laxmi Engineering Works Vs. P.S.G. Industrial Institute [(1995) 3 Supreme Court Cases 583].

The revision petition stands disposed of.

 

 
......................J
J.M. MALIK
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.