Haryana

StateCommission

MA/55/2017

M/s Goodyear India Ltd - Complainant(s)

Versus

Jagdish Singh - Opp.Party(s)

20 Mar 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

                                      Miscellaneous Application No. 55 of 2017

                                      Date of the Institution:                       01.03.2017

                                      In First Appeal No.                   591 of 2016

                                      Date of Decision:                      20.03.2017

 

 

M/s Goodyear India Ltd., 1^st Floor, ABW Elegance Tower, Plot No.8, Commercial Centre, Jasola, New Delhi-110025.

 

                   …..Applicant/Appellant/Opposite Party No.3

 

Versus

 

1.      Jagdish Singh, Post Office Bhalout, Tehsil & District Rohtak-124001, Haryana.

…Respondent No.1/Complainant

 

2.      M/s Srishti Motors Pvt. Ltd., Partner, Opp. New Power House, Near Jind Bye Pass Road, Rohtak-126102, Haryana.

 

…Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.1

 

3.      Ms. Hyundai Motors India Ltd., Partner.

 

…Respondent No.3/Opposite Party No.2

 

 

 

CORAM:    Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. Balbir Singh, Judicial Member.        

                   

Present:-    Mr. Pankaj Maini, counsel for the Applicant/Appellant/Opposite Party No.3.

 

                                                          O R D E R

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

First Appeal No.591 of 2016 titled “M/s Goodyear India Limited Versus Jagdish Singh and others” was decided by this Commission vide order dated December 01^st, 2016. In the said order, in paragraph No.8, it was mentioned that statutory amount of Rs.15,000/- deposited at the time of filing the appeal be refunded to Jagdish Singh-respondent No.1-complainant.

2.      By filing the present application No.55 of 2017, M/s Goodyear India Limited-applicant-appellant has stated that the appellant had deposited Rs.1500/- as statutory amount at the time of filing the appeal. But at the time of passing of the order dated December 01^st, 2016, the statutory amount was inadvertently typed as Rs.15000/- instead of Rs.1500/-. This Commission finds an error apparent on the basis of the record. This being so, the statutory amount of Rs.1500/- be read as statutory amount instead of Rs.15000/- in the order dated December 01^st, 2016.

3.      The original Demand Draft No.620215 dated 15^th, February, 2017 (Photocopy Annexure-I) was submitted before this Commission. On the asking of the learned counsel for the applicant, same has been returned because it has been stated by applicant that the Demand Draft shall be paid to the complainant by the applicant.

4.      Disposed of accordingly.

 

 

March 20th,  2017

Balbir Singh Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

D.R.