KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
REVISION 32/2011
ORDER DATED 30.6.2011
PRESENT
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU -- PRESIDENT
SHRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR -- MEMBER
1. Branch Manager,
LIC of India, Kilimanoor,
Thiruvananthapuram. -- REV.PETITIONERS
2. Senior Divisional Manager
LIC of India, Pattom,
Thiruvananthapuram.
(By Adv.G.S.Kalkura)
Vs.
J.Sarasamma,
Ganapathy Vilasom, Kummil, -- RESPONDENT
Kadakkal, Kollam.
ORDER
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU,PRESIDENT
The revision petitioners are the opposite parties/LIC of India in OP.371/05 in the file of CDRF, Thiruvananthapuram. The order sought to be revised is the one in IA.38/2011 dismissing the application of the revision petitioner to re-open the evidence and for permission to cross examine the complainant.
2. The Forum has dismissed the application on the ground that the revision petitioner was absent when the complainant was examined and further the complainant is a lady aged 84. Further there is a direction from this Commission to dispose of the matter as early as possible at any rate within six months.
3. The OP is of the year 2005. We find that it is also seen from the order that the issue can be decided without the oral evidence. Hence, we find that there is no patent illegality in the order. All the same, we find that the revision petitioner has submitted that the revision petitioners/opposite party’s evidence was also closed and he could not got marked the documents. In the circumstances, the Forum is directed to re-open the matter and permit the opposite party to adduce evidence and dispose the case on merits at the earliest.
4. In the result, the appeal is allowed in part as above.
The office will forward a copy of this order to the Forum.
JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU -- PRESIDENT
S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR -- MEMBER