Kerala

StateCommission

A/11/469

HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE CO LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

J.RAJU - Opp.Party(s)

SAJI ISSAC

27 Oct 2011

ORDER

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Vazhuthacaud,Thiruvananthapuram
 
First Appeal No. A/11/469
(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/02/2011 in Case No. CC/10/342 of District Alappuzha)
 
1. HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE CO LTD
KAYAMKULAM BRANCH,KMC32420.A,NH-47,NEAR CITY HOSPITAL,KAYAMKULAM
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. J.RAJU
PRASNTHI,CHEPPAD P.O,ALAPPUZHA
ALAPPUZHA
KERALA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

APPEAL 469./2011

JUDGMENT DATED: 27..10.2011

 

PRESENT

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU         : PRESIDENT

SRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR    : MEMBER

 

1. The Branch Manager,                           :APPELLANTS

     M/s HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Ltd.,

     Kayamkulam Branch, KMC 32420 A,

     NH-47, Near City Hospital,

     Kayamkulam – 690502.

 

2. The General Manager,

    M/s HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Ltd.,

    5th Floor, Eureka Towers, Mindspace Complex,

    Link Road, Malad(West) Mumbai 400064.

 

(By Adv. Saji Issac.K.J.)

 

                Vs.

 

J.Raju, Prasanthi, Cheppad.P.O.,  :RESPONDENT

Alappuzha 690507.

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU         : PRESIDENT

 

          The appellants are the opposite parties in CC.342/2010 in the file of CDRF. Alappuzha.  The appellants are under orders to refund Rs.1,00,000/- with interest at 18% from the date of  payment and pay compensation of Rs.25000/- and also to pay a punitive cost of Rs.10000/- and cost of Rs.2000/-.

          2. The matter is with respect to the alleged deficiency in service on the part of the  opposite parties with respect to the insurance policy having a single premium of 1,00,000/-.  It is the allegation that subsequently the opposite parties have split up the amount of 1,00,000/-to Rs.50000/- each and issued two policies and demanded for payment of a further amount of 50000/- each for the 2 policies. 

          3. Opposite parties remained ex parte before the Forum.

          4. It is the case of the appellants/opposite parties  that  in fact they had appeared before the Forum and filed version which was rejected as not filed in time.

          5.  In view of the fact that the order is not a contested one.  The order of the Forum is set aside on condition that the appellants/opposite parties pay a sum of Rs.8000/- towards cost to the complainant or remit the same before the Forum which can be withdrawn by the complainant. On payment of cost the Forum will permit the opposite parties to contest the matter, to file version and adduce evidence and also to cross examine the witnesses and dispose of the case on merits.

          4. The case stands posted before the Forum on 28..11..2011.

          Office will forward the copy of this order to the Forum urgently

 

 

          JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU       : PRESIDENT

 

 

          S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR           : MEMBER

 

Ps.

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.