MR. BIBEKANANDA DAS, MEMBER:-
The Complainant has filed this C.C.Case No. 15/2022 U/s-35 of C.P.Act, 2019 challenging disconnection notice of the Ops and seeking correction of bill.
Ops have filed their written version stating that the Complainant made an application to install a new pole to his house for power supply. But actually the Complainant had requested and put an application before the Ops for shifting the electric pole on 13.04.22. The Ops consider his application for shifting the electric pole with required procedure and documents, which is estimated by the Engineers of the Ops to communicated to the Complainant vide memo No. 924 dt. 18.04.2022. The cost of the estimate will bearable by the Complainant. The Ops also give demand notice to the Complainant on dt. 19.04.22. The complainant knowingly the estimate copy & demand note in ulterior motive with illegally unauthorized shifted the LT pole without the consent/knowledge of Ops. He also violated the Rules & Regulations of OERC. The Ops imposed the cost of the Demand Note in his electric bill on dt. 19.05.22 i.e, Rs. 52,383/- and thereafter amicably settlement by the Complainant & Ops the above said amount also debit from his electric bill amount in the month of July, 2023.
In view of his fact that the matter has already been settled between the parties and Rs. 52,276.58/- which was the excess bill has been withdrawn by the Ops. We find that the Ops have settled the matter after getting notice of this Commission and Complainant has already got the relief sought for in this C.C.Case and as such we find nothing to be adjudicated and accordingly the C.C.Case No. 15/2022 is disposed off and we impose no cost and compensation.
With the aforesaid observations the C.C.Case No. 15/2022 along with I.A No. 7/2022 is accordingly disposed off.
Issue extract of the order to the parties for compliance.
Pronounced in the open Commission, on this the 16th day of August,2023
I, agree.
Sd/- Sd/-
PRESIDENT MEMBER
