Arjuni Panda filed a consumer case on 26 Aug 2015 against J.E Electrical Section Binjharpur in the Jajapur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/37/2015 and the judgment uploaded on 03 Sep 2015.
IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JAJPUR.
Present: 1.Shri Biraja Prasad Kar, President,
2.Sri Pitabas Mohanty, Member,
3.Miss Smita Ray, Lady Member.
Dated the 26th day of August,2015.
C.C.Case No.37 of 2015
Arjuni Panda,S/O Parikhita Panda
At/P.O. Kapila ,P.S. Binjharpur
Dist.Jajpur ……………Complt.
Versus.
1. J.E, Electrical,Binjharpur.
2. S.D.O,Electrical Section ,Binjharpur.
……………..Opp.Parties.
For the Complainant: Sri Srinibas Pati, Advocate.
For the Opp.Parties Self.
Date of order: 26. 08. 2015.
SHRI PITABAS MOHANTY, MEMBER .
The petitioner has filed the present dispute alleging deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.
The fact relevant in the present dispute shortly are that as per complaint petition the petitioner is a domestic consumer under the O.Ps. bearing consumer No.423080646. . The petitioner was paying the electrical dues of the O.Ps. regularly .
That in the month of February-2015 the petitioner suddenly received a inflated bill from the O.Ps amounting to Rs.13,106/- . Thereafter the petitioner approached the O.Ps. through written application regarding correction of the wrong inflated bill. But the O.Ps. threatened that if the arrear dues will not be deposited in time ,the power supply will be disconnected from the premises of the petitioner
Accordingly finding no other way the petitioner has filed the present dispute with the prayer to direct the O.Ps. for correction of the inflated electricity bill and not to disconnect the power supply from the premises of the petitioner till disposal of the present dispute.
After notices the O.Ps. have appeared and filed their written version denying the allegations of the petitioner. In the written version the O.Ps. have taken the following the defence:
There is no such consumer existing as Arjuni Panda bearing consumer No.423080646 ( as stated in the petition) . However , we traced Arjuni Panda from Kapila Village whose consumer No.BR2369RJ(6124 2302 0646) and who became a consumer since December’2011 under RGGVY scheme. The petitioner is a consumer under Rajiv Jyoti Scheme pertaining to Binjharpur-11 Electrical Section and his consumer No.BR2369RJ. The petitioner has an arrear amount of Rs.15,203.13/- up to Apr’2015 . As per office records the details of petitioner energy bills and payments their of made by petitioner is enclosed herewith for details ascertain of payment as well as outstanding of the respective petitioner.
The meter of the petitioner was got defective during Dec’2012 due to excess load. The petitioner has connected more load than the load prescribed to him and from that period the billing was being made on average basis. The petitioner has never complained regarding his matter before us. After three months billing with the new meter the energy bill of the complainant will be revised as per Departmental norms. More over, the complainant is paid only Rs.1000/- from Dec’12 to Feb’15.
In view of the above pleadings we have perused the record along with documents and ledger copy filed by both the parties in details and inclined to dispose of the dispute as per our observation given below:-
It is cristal clear that the O.Ps. admitted in their written version supported with the ledger copy from the side of the O.Ps that the energy charges has been assessed on average basis which is contrary to regulation -86 and 93(8) of OERC code-2004.
In the above observation from our side we dispose of the dispute as per the order given below:-
O R D E R
In the net result the dispute is disposed of . The O.Ps. are directed to revise the provisional / load factor inflated electricity bill of the petitioner by installing a new tested meter in place of the defective meter of the premises of the petitioner from January-2013 till installation of new meter as per section -97 of OERC Code-2004 within three months after receipt of this order. As regards arrear of electricity bill of the O.Ps they may recover the same after the revision as per law. No cost.
This order is pronounced in the open Forum on this the 26th day of August ,2015. under my hand and seal of the Forum.
(Shri Biraja Prasad Kar ) (Shri Pitabas Mohanty)
President. Member.
Typed to my dictation & corrected by me
(Miss Smita Ray) (Shri Pitabas Mohanty)
Member. Member.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.