Complaint Case No. CC/02/438 |
| | 1. Mr. Micky R. Mahbubani through father Mr. R. Mahbubani | 22, Gitanjali Building, Colaba, Mumbai 400 005. | Mumbai | Maharashtra | 2. Mr. Gobind G. Mahbubani | 22, Gitanjali Building Colaba, Mumbai 400 005. | Mumbai | Maharashtra |
| ...........Complainant(s) | Versus | 1. J. H. B. Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. | Mangal Murti, Plot No. 17, Sector 30, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai 400 705. | Navi Mumbai | Maharashtra | 2. Mr. Harivansh Singh, Director | J.H.B. Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., Mangal Murti, Plot No. 17, Sector 30, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai 400 705. | Navi Mumbai | Maharashtra | 3. Mr. Bhulan N. Yadav, Director | M/s. J. H. B. Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., Mangal Murti, Plot No. 17, Sector - 30, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai 400 705 | Navi Mumbai | Maharashtra | 4. Mr. Bharat Singh Thakur, Director | M/s. J.H.B. Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., Mangal Murti, Plot No. 17, Sector 30, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai 400 705. | Navi Mumbai | Maharashtra | 5. Mr. Manoj Kumar L. Singh, Director | M/s. J. H. B. Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., Mangal Murti, Plot No. 17, Sector 30, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai 400 705. | Navi Mumbai | Maharashtra |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
ORDER | Per Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member Advocate Mr.Suresh Sharma has filed an affidavit of Director of the Company informing that the complainant has taken possession of the premises. In view of this, we are finding that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the complaint further. We have given 2-3 chances to Advocate Mr.Nair to produce complainant. But, according to Advocate Mr.Nair, complainant is not approaching him for prosecuting this complaint. Even letter sent to the complainant returned unserved. Therefore, for want of prosecution, we dismiss this complaint. Hence, the following order :- -: ORDER :- 1. Complaint stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. No order as to costs. 3. Copies of the order be furnished to the parties. Pronounced Dated 3rd August 2011. | |