Kerala

Kottayam

CC/202/2020

Thomas Pothan - Complainant(s)

Versus

J Sivasankaran Ganesh - Opp.Party(s)

16 May 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/202/2020
( Date of Filing : 15 Dec 2020 )
 
1. Thomas Pothan
Thakidiparambil, West Temple Road, Kottayam-1.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. J Sivasankaran Ganesh
St. Antony's Pulimoodu Junction, Kottayam.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 May 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 16th of May, 2022

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

                                                           

C C No. 202/2020 (filed on 15-12-2020)

 

Petitioner                                          :         Dr. Thomas Pothen,

                                                                   Thakidiparambil House,

                                                                   West Temple Road,

                                                                   Kottayam – 1.

                                                                             Vs.                            

Opposite Party                                 :         Mr. J. Sivasankaran Ganesh,                                                                    

                                                                  St. Antony’s,

                                                                   Pulimoodu Junction,

                                                                   Kottayam.

 

                                                          O  R  D  E  R

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

          Both parties absent.  The complainant is absent even after repeated notices from this Commission.  The complainant has not turned up to adduce evidence before us to substantiate his case.  There are only two documents filed along with the complaint.  One purchase bill and a bill of switch.  As no sufficient evidence is adduced either by way of proof affidavit or through documents.  Hence the complaint is dismissed as we don’t find any deficiency of service on the part of the opposite party.

          Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 16th day of May, 2022

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                 Sd/-

Sri. Manulal V.S. President             Sd/-

                                                                                      By Order

                                                                               Assistant Registrar

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.