Karnataka

Bangalore Urban

CC/309/2022

R Krishnamurthy - Complainant(s)

Versus

ITI Employees Housing Co-op Society Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

T Krishnadas Rai

08 Mar 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
8TH FLOOR, B.W.S.S.B BUILDING, K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE-09
 
Complaint Case No. CC/309/2022
( Date of Filing : 13 Dec 2022 )
 
1. R Krishnamurthy
Aged about 58 Years, S/o R Bairayya, Residing at C-16,Y Road, ITI Colony, Dooravaninagar,Bengaluru-560016
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ITI Employees Housing Co-op Society Ltd
Dooravani Nagar,Bengaluru-560016,Rep by President
2. ITI Employees Housing Co-op Society Ltd
Dooravani Nagar,Bengaluru-560016,Rep by Secretary cum Chief Executive Officer
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. M. SHOBHA PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Mar 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Complaint filed on:20.12.2022

Disposed on:08.03.2023

                                                                              

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT BANGALORE (URBAN)

 

DATED 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2023

 

PRESENT:-  SMT.M.SHOBHA        

:

PRESIDENT

   
   
   

SMT.SUMA ANIL KUMAR

:

MEMBER   

   
   
   

                          

                      

COMPLAINT No.309/2022

                                     

 

COMPLAINANT

 

  •  

Aged about 58 years,

S/o. R.Bairayya,

R/at C-16, Y Road,

ITI Colony, Dooravaninagar,

Bengaluru 560 016.

 

 

 

(SRI.T.Krishnadas Rai, Advocate)

  •  

OPPOSITE PARTY

1

ITI Employees Housing Co-op Society Ltd.,

Dooravani Nagar,

Bengaluru 560 016.

Rep. by President

 

 

2

ITI Employees Housing Co-op Society Ltd.,

Dooravani Nagar,

Bengaluru 560 016.

Rep. by Secretary cum Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 

(Absent)

 

ORDER

SMT.M.SHOBHA, PRESIDENT

  1. The complaint has been filed under Section 35 of C.P.Act (hereinafter referred as an Act) against the OP for the following reliefs against the OP:-

(a) Allot a site measuring 30 X 40 feet free from all encumbrances in the Nagruru Layout formed by the ITI Employees Housing Co-op Society Ltd., in favour of the complainant immediately.

(b)  Or alternatively, refund Rs.8,40,000/- along with penal compound interest @ 21% per year from the date of receipt of each payment made to the ITI Employees Housing Co-Op society ltd., immediately.

(c) Payment of compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- towards damages for deficiency of service, causing undue hardship, harassment and mental agony caused to the complainant.

(d) Rs.50,000/- towards the cost of complaint to the complainant.

(e) Grant such other relief.

 

  1. The case set up by the complainant in brief is as under:-

It is the case of the complainant that he is the member of the OP society bearing staff No.19807 vide receipt No.7147 dated 03.01.2012 after remitted required fees.  The OP has released a circular dated 28.11.2004 inviting applications from its members for allotment of site in different dimensions in its newly formed layout located at Nagarur Village, Bangalore.  The complainant in response has applied for allotment of residential site measuring 30X40 feet on 03.01.2012 while she was in service in the company.  The complainant has remitted amount of Rs.30,000/- to the OP society on 03.01.2012 and further paid an amount of Rs.3,20,000/- as demanded by the OP society on 12.01.2012. Again the complainant paid an amount of Rs.4,90,000/- on 04.09.2019.  The complainant has paid total amount of Rs.8,40,000/- to the OP society towards sital value for allotment of residential site in Nagarur layout formed by them.

 

  1. The OP have assured the allotment of site to the complainant within next two months vide their circular dated 13.12.2011. The Ops have allotted totally 248 sites to the members on 19.12.20211. Even though the complainant was eligible for allotment of site measuring 30X40 feet he was denied allotment by the OP society without any valid reasons.

 

  1. The Ops have also assured the complainant that the allotment will be done within next two months and they have continuously assured the complainant that the formation of the layout is in progress and they have demanded the payment towards the allotment and registration of the site.

 

  1. When the OP have not allotted the site finally he got issued legal notice on 03.10.2022 to the OP for allotment of site and for registration of the same or otherwise to refund the amount with compound interest @ 21% with compensation of Rs.10,00,000/-.  

 

  1. The complainant has waited for 10 years looking forward to the allotment of the site by the OP but the complainant was shocked with the arbitrary and irresponsible reply given by the Ops.  Hence she has filed this complaint.

 

  1. In response to the notice, OP has not appeared before this Commission. Hence OP placed exparte.

 

  1. The complainant has filed his affidavit evidence and relies on 17 documents. 

 

  1. Heard the arguments of advocate for the complainant and complainant filed written arguments.

 

  1. The following points arise for our consideration as are:-
  1. Whether the complainant proves deficiency of service on the part of OP?
  2. Whether the complainant is entitled to relief mentioned in the complaint?
  3. What order?

 

  1. Our answers to the above points are as under:

Point No.1:  Affirmative

Point No.2: Affirmative in part

Point No.3: As per final orders

 

 

REASONS

  1. Point No.1 AND 2: These two points are inter related and hence they have taken for common discussion.  We have perused the allegations made in the complaint and documents 1 to 17 and written arguments filed by both the parties.
  2. The complainant has reiterated all the allegations made in the complaint and also relied on 17 documents.  The complainant has produced the initial membership receipt dated 03.01.2012 as document No.1.  The circular issued by the OP inviting application for allotment of site dated 28.12.2004 as document No.2.  The complainant had applied for 30X40 feet dimension site and remitted Rs.8,40,000/- promptly on various dates commencing from 03.01.2012 and final payment on 04.09.2019 as demanded by the OP society.  The said amount was received by the OP and also acknowledged the receipts for the same vide document No.4 to 6.
  3. The complainant has appeared and led evidence.  Even though the OP have received the entire amount from the complainant they have miserably failed to publish the seniority list and allot the sites ignoring the seniority of the members.  The OP have made the complainant to believe that at one or the other time they will allot their site.  Complainant has waited for more than 10 years by paying the entire sale consideration amount of Rs.8,40,000/-.
  4. Even though notice was sent to OP they have failed to appear before this Commission and contest the matter.
  5. The complainant became member of the OP society as per document No.1 and the OP society have received the amount vide receipt dated 03.01.2012, 12.01.2012 and 04.09.2019.  The complainant became the member after receiving the membership fee by the OP from 03.01.2012 itself.  If the complainant is not a member of the OP society they would not have issued the circular Document No.2 and also they would not have received the amount towards allotment of site.  Even though the complainant has started making payment from the year 2012 itself till 2019 the OP neither allotted any site in favour of the complainant nor refunded the money.
  6. The complainant even though eligible for the allotment as per the seniority list the OP society have allotted sites to some other person without considering his seniority list.  
  7. The complainant has sought for to direct the Ops to allot the site in the layout formed by them at Nagarur or in the alternative refund the amount of Rs.8,40,000/- with compound interest at 21% pa., from the date of receipt of each payment made to the society immediately and also for compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- and cost of litigation of Rs.50,000/-.  

 

  1. If the sites are available the OP may be directed to allot the site measuring 30 feet X 40 feet at Nagarur village, or alternatively if the sites are not available it would be just and proper to direct the OP to return the amount of Rs.8,40,000/- deposited by the complainant to the OP society.  The complainant has deposited the amount from 03.01.2012 and final payment was made on 04.09.2019 as per the demand made by the OP society.  If such amount is deposited by the complainant in similar such projects could have earned more or got a site or flat of his dream in and around Bangalore city.

 

 

  1. In order to compensate the complainant the award of interest @ 21% as sought is on the higher side.  Hence this Commission is of the view that awarding of interest at 16% p.a., from the date of receipt of each payment by the OP society would meet the ends of justice. The OP have received the hard earned money from the member/complainant in between 2012 and 2019.  Hence the complainant is entitled for 16% p.a., interest.  The complainant is also entitled for compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- and litigation expenses of Rs.10,000/-. Hence we answer point No.1 in affirmative and point No.2 partly in affirmative.
  2. Point No.3:- In view the discussion referred above we proceed to pass the following;

O R D E R

  1. The complaint is allowed in part.
  2. OP is directed to allot the site measuring 30X40 feet at Nagarur Layout, formed by the OP if it is available or in the alternative refund Rs.8,40,000/- with interest @ 16% p.a., from the date of receipt of each payment till realization.
  3. OP is further directed to pay Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation with litigation expenses of Rs.10,000/- to the complainant.
  4. The OP shall comply this order within 60 days from this date, failing which the OP shall pay interest at 18% p.a. after expiry of 60 days on Rs.8,40,000/- till final payment.
  5. Furnish the copy of this order and return the extra pleadings and documents to the parties.

 

(Dictated to the Stenographer, got it transcribed and corrected, pronounced in the Open Commission on this 08th day of MARCH, 2023)

 

 

(SUMA ANIL KUMAR)

        MEMBER

      (M.SHOBHA)

       PRESIDENT

 

 

 

Documents produced by the Complainant-P.W.1 are as follows:

 

1.

Ex.P.1

Copy of the membership receipt

2.

Ex.P.2

Copy of the circular No.ITI EHCS/04/2004-05 dated 28.11.2004

3.

Ex.P.3

Copy of the application form

4

Ex.P.4 to 6

Copy of the three receipts

4.

Ex.P.7 to 10

Copy of four circulars

5.

Ex.P.11

Extract of annual report

6.

Ex.P.12

Copy of the circular

7

Ex.P.13 & 14

Extract of annual report

7.

Ex.P.15

Copy of the circular

8.

Ex.P.16

Reply to the legal notice dated 03.10.2022

9

Ex.P17

Copy of the circular

 

 

Documents produced by the representative of opposite party;

 

NIL

 

 

 

(SUMA ANIL KUMAR)

        MEMBER

      (M.SHOBHA)

       PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. M. SHOBHA]
PRESIDENT
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.