Naresh Kumar filed a consumer case on 04 May 2017 against IREO Grace Reatech in the West Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/14/810 and the judgment uploaded on 12 May 2017.
CC-810/14 D.O.O- 04.05.2017
Present :- Shri Ashish Prakash advocate for complainant.
Shri P. Vijay Kumar advocate for OP.
Rejoinder and Evidence by way of affidavit not filed by complainant. Learned counsel for opposite party pointed out that total value of the flat is Rs.2,14,89,233.80/. Therefore, this forum has no pecuniary jurisdiction to try this complaint. He further argued that Hon’able National Commission in order dated 07.10.2016 passed in appeal no.644/2015 titled Parikshit Parashar V/S M/S Universal Buildwell Pvt.Ltd. and others held that total value of the flat is to be seen For the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction.
Learned Counsel for complainant admitted that total price of the flat is Rs. 2,14,89,233.80/-. Therefore, in view of Parikshit Parashar’s case (supra) this forum has no pecuniary jurisdiction to try the complaint.
Therefore, complaint is returned for presentation before competent forum of jurisdiction. File be consigned to record room.
.
(PUNEET LAMBA) ( R.S. BAGRI )
MEMBER PRESIDENT
04.05.2017 04.05.2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.