Haryana

StateCommission

CC/713/2017

SHAKUNTAL GULIA - Complainant(s)

Versus

IREO FIVE RIVER PVT.LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

SANDEEP KR. BHARDWAJ

21 May 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                         

                                                          Date of Institution: 10.11.2017

                                                          Date of final hearing:21.05.2024

                                                          Date of Pronouncement: 21.05.2024

 

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.713 OF 2017

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

Smt. ShakuntlaGulia resident of House No.879, Sector- 21, Panchkula, Haryana.

 

 

                                      ….Complainant

Versus

 

 

 

1. IREO RiveRiver Pvt. Ltd. (An IREO Group Company) SCO No.6, 7, 8 First and Second Floor, Sector-9D, Chandigarh 160009 through its Authorized Signatory/Partner/Prop.
2. Site Manager, IREO, FiveRiver Project at Pinjore, Panchkula, Haryana.

 

....Opposite Parties

 

         

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President

                   Mr. S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL Member                                                                                                                                        

 

Present:     None for the complainant.

                   Opposite parties already proceeded against ex parte.

 

 

 

 

PER: T.P.S. MANN, J.

 

ORDER

 

 

1. On 12.10.2023, the State Commission had passed the following order:-

“The complaint is at the stage of recording evidence of the complainant.

On 11.04.2023, when none appeared for recording evidence of the complainant, the proceedings were adjourned in the interest of justice but it was made clear that in case, the complainant failed to record her evidence on the adjourned date, the complaint might be dismissed for want of prosecution. Position remained the same on the adjourned date i.e. 03.08.2023. Even today, none has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant.

It appears that the complainant is no more interested in prosecuting the present complaint. Still in the interest of justice, adjourned to 08.12.2023 for recording evidence of the complainant.

It is however made clear that in case, there is no representation on behalf of the complainant on the adjourned date, the complaint shall be dismissed for want of prosecution.”

 

2. On 08.12.2023, 15.02.2024 as well as on the previous date i.e. 05.03.2024, none has put in appearance for the complainant. Further, the complainant has not taken any steps to record her evidence.
3. In view of the above and also in view of the order passed on 12.10.2023, the State Commission has no other option but to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution.
4. Resultantly, the complaint is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
5. Application(s) pending, if any, stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order.
6. A copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the law. The order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.
7. File be consigned to record room along with a copy of this order.

 

 

 

                                                                                      (T.P.S. MANN)

                                                                                      PRESIDENT

 

 

 

                                                                                      (S.P. SOOD)

JUDICIAL MEMBER 

Pronounced On: 21.05.2024

MS