At the outset, it is pointed out by learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners that though the entire amount, as directed by the Fora below has been paid to the Complainant in the Execution proceedings but the Petitioners had no option but to file these Petitions and press -3- the same as after the orders impugned in the present Revision Petitions were made in favour of the Complainant, he had altogether stopped paying the Monthly Equated Installments under the Hypothecation Agreements dated 29.12.2004 in respect of the vehicles in question. In view of the submission, we dispose of the present Revision Petitions as having been rendered infructuous, keeping open the question of law sought to be raised therein. We, however, clarify that the dismissal of these Revision Petitions will not come in the way of the Petitioners’ in taking recourse to appropriate legal proceedings for recovery of the balance amounts due to them from the Complainant. Since despite service of notice, the Respondent remain unrepresented, there will be no order as to costs. Both the Revision Petitions stand disposed of in the above terms. | 
