Pardeep Kumar filed a consumer case on 18 Apr 2023 against Intex Technologies Pvt Ltd in the Fatehgarh Sahib Consumer Court. The case no is CC/34/2022 and the judgment uploaded on 21 Jun 2023.
Punjab
Fatehgarh Sahib
CC/34/2022
Pardeep Kumar - Complainant(s)
Versus
Intex Technologies Pvt Ltd - Opp.Party(s)
Sh B B Sharma
18 Apr 2023
ORDER
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION
FATEHGARH SAHIB.
Consumer Complaint No.
:
CC/34 of 2022
Date of Institution
:
19.04.2022
Date of Decision
:
18.04.2023
Pardeep Kumar aged about 48 years son of Sh. Kewal Krishan resident of Village Badali Ala Singh, Tehsil and Distt. Fatehgarh Sahib.
…………....Complainant
Versus
Intex Technologies Pvt. Ltd., D-18,Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-2, New Delhi-110020 through its Authorized Signatory.
Bulk and Brands, S.C.O 18-19, near J.P. Hospital, Zirakpur-Chandigarh Road, Zirakpur, Distt. S.A.S. Nagar Mohali through its Authorized Signatory..
..………....... Opposite Parties
Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019
Quorum
Sh. S.K. Aggarwal, President
Ms. Shivani Bhargava, Member
Sh. Manjit Singh Bhinder, Member
Present: Sh.Bharat Bhushan Sharma, counsel for complainant.
Opposite parties no.1 and 2 Ex-Parte vide order dated 3.8.2022
The complaint has been filed against the OPs (opposite parties) under Section 34 of Consumer Protection Act-2019 alleging deficiency in service with the prayer for giving direction to refund the amount of price of the Air Conditioner i.e Rs.21,500/- along with update interest at the rate of 18@ P.A to the complainant , to pay Rs.50,000/- as compensation on account of mental agony .
The complainant purchased one Air Conditioner @ 8415 intex 1 ton 3 star split A.C INS12Cue3EC on 11.5.2021 from the OP no.2 for the amount of Rs.21,500/- including taxes and the complainant made the payment of above said amount to OP no.2. The OP no.2 issued a invoice/bill no.283/2021-22 dated 11.5.2021 in favour of the complainant and also gave warranty of 12 months of the same and 5 years warranty of compressor of the AC.. After purchase of above said A.C, the Ops got installed the same in the residential house of the complainant . After few days from the purchase of the above said Air Conditioner, the same stopped functioning and leakage started in the said A.C. Then the complainant made a complaint to the care center of the OP no.1 in the month of July 2021 and the mechanics of the OPs repaired the same by changing the coil of the A.C. on 15.07.2021 and assured that the problem will not occur in future and now the A.C will work in proper manner. After the said repair , the A.C in question again stopped cooling after few days and this time also the complainant informed the OP no.1 and the mechanics of the OPs again repaired the same in the last week of August 2021and also assured that the problem will not occur again. In the first week of April 2022, when the complainant started the A.C but the A. C was not cooling and the defect in the A.C could not be detected by the mechanic of the OPs. The complainant again approached the OP no.2 and told about the defect of A.C but the OP no.2 totally denied to repair the A.C. and also told the complainant that the OPs have no liability to repair the A.C. The complainant requested the OPs that the A. C is under warranty period and the OPs are legally bound to repair the A.C and OPs have sold the A.C. to the complainant which is having manufacturing defect. OPs did not pay any heed to the requests of complainant. Hence this complaint.
Notice of the complaint was given to the OPs no.1 and 2 through registered Post . OPs no. l and 2 did not come forward to file written version and they were proceeded against Ex-Parte vide order 03.08.2022
The complainant in support of his complaint tendered in evidence his affidavit Ex.CW1/1, and Photo copies of documents i.e ExC1 Tax invoice dated 11.5.2021, Ex.C2 Aadhaar Card, Ex.C3 complaint dted 15.7.2021and closed the evidence.
Heard. Entire record has been perused.
From the perusal of the record on file, it is evident that the complainant had purchased a Intex 1 Ton 3 star split A.C from OP no.2 vide Ex.C1. The main grouse of the complainant was that A.C started troubling of low cooling with in 2 months form the date of purchase. The complainant lodged number of complaints with the Ops regarding the aforesaid defects. The service engineers of the OPs once changed the coil of the A.C which did not bring in the desired relief to the complainant. The service engineers of the OPs many times tried to rectify the defects in the A.C vide Ex.C3. The allegations set out in the complaint goes unrebutted and unopposed as the OPs did not choose to contest the complaint. It raised a reasonable presumption that OPs remain deficient in providing services. It is thus proved that the Ops sold a defective product to the complainant and failed to remove the defects in the A.C. OPs are thus held liable for deficiency in service.
As a corollary of our above discussion, the present complaint is partly allowed. OPs no.1 and 2 are held jointly & severally liable for deficiency in service. The OPs no.1 and 2 are directed as under:-
[a] To make the A.C workable by making videographyas per the satisfaction of complainantwithin 15 days from the date of receipt of order. Failing whichthe OP will refund thePrice of A.C i. e Rs.21,500/- to the complainantalong with interest@ 6% P.A from the date of filing of complaint within 30 days, failing which interest @ 9% P.A. shall be payable. The complainant is directed to return the A. C in his possession to the OPs simultaneously in case of refund .
[b] To pay Rs.5,000/-compensation for harassmentandlitigation charges to the complainant.
Compliance of the order be made by the OPs no.1and 2 within30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Failing which the complainant shall be entitled to recover the above said amount through legal process. The complaint could not be decided within the statutory period due to pandemic of Covid-19. Copy of this order be sent to the complainant and the OPs as per rules. File be consigned to record room.
Pronounced 18 April 2023.
(S.K. Aggarwal)
President
(Shivani Bhargava)
Member
( Manjit Singh Bhinder )
Member
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.