DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

CSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.

CC No: 1101/2016

GAGAN                                                … COMPLAINANT

Versus

INTEX TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LTD. & ORS.… OPPOSITE PARTY (IES)

COMPLAINT U/S 12 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986

CORAM:SH. M.K. GUPTA, PRESIDENT

SH. BARIQ AHMED, MEMBER

MS. USHA KHANNA, MEMBER

ORDER                       Date: 23.05.2018

SH. M.K. GUPTA, PRESIDENT

Perused file. It is true that none is appearing for the complainant since last dates of hearings i.e. 20.03.2017, 08.04.2017, 12.10.2017, 14.12.2017, 13.03.2018& 23.05.2018 consecutively. Court notice through speed post issued to the complainant could not be delivered to the complainant as per track report due to reason “item delivery attempted insufficient address”. There is no other address of the complainant on the record.Several calls have been given since morning. But none on behalf of the complainant has appeared.

It appears that the complainant is not interested in pursuing his case. It will be abuse of process to proceed further in the absence of the complainant. Hence complaint is dismissed in default for the reasons mentioned above. File be consigned to record room.

Announced on this 23^rdday of May, 2018.

(MEMBER)                          (MEMBER)                                (PRESIDENT)