This order shall dispose of revision petitions No.3056/2011 and 25/2013.  As the question of law and facts involved in both these revision petitions is the same, they are being disposed of by this common order.

           Complainant Petitioner, instead of filing on composite complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, filed 2 complaints i.e. Complaint No.30/2005 and 33/2005.  Both the complaints were filed on the same date.  Complaint No.30/2005 has been dismissed by the fora below on the ground that it involved disputed questions of law requiring taking of elaborate evidence which could not be decided in a summary manner under the Consumer Protection Act.  Complaint No.33/2005 was dismissed by the State Commission by holding that the Petitioner had an alternate remedy under Haryana Cooperative Societies Act.  Appeal preferred by the Petitioner was dismissed both on the ground of limitation as well as on merits. 

           R.P. No.25/2013 arises out of Complaint No.30/2005 whereas R.P. No.3056/2011 arises out of Complaint No.33/2005.

           Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the revision petitions as well as the Complaints reserving liberty with the Petitioner to seek redressal of his grievances in any other forum.  Counsel for the respondent has no objection to the prayer made by the counsel for the Petitioner.

           Revision petitions as well as the complaints are dismissed as withdrawn.  Liberty is reserved with the Petitioner to seek redressal of his grievances in any other Forum along with an application under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act for condoning the delay for the time spent before the consumer fora, keeping in mind the observations made by the Supreme Court in Laxmi Engineering Works vs.PSG Industrial Institute – (1995) 3 SCC 583.