Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/434/2022

Agnus Joseph - Complainant(s)

Versus

Integrated - Opp.Party(s)

09 Jan 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

               SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN           : PRESIDENT

          SMT.PREETHA G NAIR     : MEMBER

          SRI.VIJU.V.R                        : MEMBER

CC.NO.434/2022 (Filed on : 17/11/2022)

ORDER DATED : 09/01/2023

COMPLAINANT

Agnus Joseph @ Tresa Joseph,

Residing at Golden Lane,

No.13/1, TC .44/696-1, Valiyathura,

Vallakkadavu.P.O

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 008

(By Adv.K.Sreekumaran Nair)

                                                          VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

  1. M/s.Integrated Registry,

Management Services (Pvt) Ltd,

United Astra Zeneca Pharma India (Ltd)

30, Ramana Residency, 4th Cross,

Sampige Road, Malleshawaram,

Bangalore – 560 003, Karnataka

Rep.by its Company Secretary

 

  1. Mr.Pratap Rudra,

Company Secretary and Legal Counsel,

Astra Zeneca Pharma India Ltd,

Business Park, Roshanahalli,

Outer Ring Road, Bangalore – 560 045

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN                  : PRESIDENT

1. This complaint is filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2.       This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties. The opposite parties entered appearance through counsel and sought time for filing version and this case was adjourned to 25/01/2023 for filing version of the opposite parties. Meanwhile on 07/01/2023 the complainant’s counsel filed a memo stating that the complainant is not willing to further proceed with this complaint. To consider the memo fled by the counsel appearing for the complainant, the case was suomoto advanced from 25/01/2023 to this date and the said memo was accepted and recorded. In view of the memo filed by the counsel appearing for the complainant, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as not pressed.

          In the result, complaint is dismissed as not pressed. There will be no order as to costs.

            A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

         Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 9th day of January 2023.

                                                                                                 Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

                                                                                       Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                                                                                        Sd/-

                          VIJU.V.R        : MEMBER

be/

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.