Shaiju N G filed a consumer case on 13 Feb 2023 against Indus Ind Bank Ltd in the Idukki Consumer Court. The case no is CC/22/2022 and the judgment uploaded on 29 Mar 2023.
DATE OF FILING : 27/01/2022
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, IDUKKI
Dated this the 13th day of February 2023
Present :
SRI.C.SURESHKUMAR PRESIDENT
SMT.ASAMOL P. MEMBER
SRI.AMPADY K.S. MEMBER
CC NO.22/2022
Between
Complainant : 1 . Shaiju N.G.,
Residing at Nedumpurath House,
Parathode P.O., Parathode, Konnathadi,
Idukki District – 685 571.
2 . Rajee Shaiju,
Residing at Nedumpurath House,
Parathode P.O., Parathode, Konnathadi,
Idukki District – 685 571.
(By Adv.K.B.Selvam)
And
Opposite Party :1 . Indusind Bank Ltd.,
Represented by its Branch Manager,
Indusind Bank Ltd., 2nd Floor,
Ponnappala’s Queen Tower, Kallarkutty Road,
Adimaly P.O., Idukki – 685 561.
2 . Indusind Bank Ltd.,
Represented by its Manager (Legal),
Indusind Bank Ltd., Registered Office
at New No.34, Old Nos.115 & 116,
G.N.Chetty Road, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017.
O R D E R
SMT.ASAMOL P., MEMBER
Complainant’s case is briefly discussed hereunder:-
1 . First complainant is a taxi driver and he has purchased a Mahindra Bolero Pick Up FB 2WD BS IV vehicle with engine No.TBJIG68561 and Registration No.KL 06 J 2545. Total cost of the said vehicle was
(Cont.....2)
-2-
Rs.7,19,600/-. Out of the total amount the first complainant has paid Rs.1,00,000/-. On 16/11/2018 opposite parties have sanctioned the loan and disbursed Rs.6,19,600/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Nineteen Thousand and Six Hundred only) with 9% interest per annum payable by 70 monthly instalments. Second complainant was the surety of the said loan. First complainant has remitted the instalments for last five years.
2 . As per the agreement between the complainants and opposite parties, first complainant has to re-pay Rs.15,100/- as monthly instalments on 15th day of every month and last instalment falls due on the 15/08/2024 and every month the first complainant is paid instalment worth Rs.15,100/-. Thus he has totally paid Rs.3,50,000/- . Thereafter, the monthly instalments were defaulted. Because, he was financially down due to flood and Covid-19 circumstances. So, first complainant could not remit the loan instalment.
3 . Thereafter, first opposite party has sent demand notice for remitting the loan amount. Subsequently, complainants approached first opposite party and informed that they are willing to re-pay the entire dues amount within 3 months. But unexpectedly, second opposite party issued arbitration notice to complainants. Now they are demanding to repay the amount of Rs.7,29,825/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Twenty Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty Five only) together with interest @ 18% per annum. The opposite parties are charging exorbitant interest over riding the loan agreement. Complainants have no objection to repay the actual amount with 9% interest per annum.
4 . Now the opposite parties are trying to take custody of the said vehicle. It will cause heavy loss and mental agony, and also, as a taxi driver cum-owner of vehicle, 1st complainant’s life will be in misery without any income.
(Cont.....3)
-3-
5 . The loan duration is not yet completed, opposite parties are demanding exorbitant rate of interest demand is illegal. There is deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties. Hence they have prayed for the following reliefs.
1 . Opposite parties may be directed to give up exorbitant charges and exorbitant rate of interest in the loan account and exclude penal and notice charges.
2 . Also, opposite parties may be directed to pay Rs.5000/- as cost of this petition and Rs.10,000/- as compensation to complainants.
Notice was served to opposite parties from this Commission. But, opposite parties didn’t appear before this Commission. No written version filed by opposite parties also. Hence, the case was posted for complainant’s evidence. Complainants were continuously absent. No evidence adduced. Hence, case was taken for orders.
Complainants have not filed any proof affidavit. They have produced one demand notice along with the complaint. They have not adduced any evidence to prove their case. Opposite parties have neither appeared nor filed written version. They also have not adduced any evidence. Now, the points which arise for consideration are:-
Points are considered together
We have perused the complaint and demand notice which was produced along with complaint. The only allegation of complainants is that opposite parties have demanded exorbitant interest and penal charges
(Cont.....4)
-4-
under the demand notice and this is deficiency in service on their part. Complainants have not adduced any evidence. It is to prove that the demanded interest and charges by opposite parties are exorbitant. No agreement was produced between complainants and opposite parties which shows that how much interest rate was fixed for loan amount at the time of availing it. Also, there is no evidence about how much amount was repaid to the loan account by complainants. Hence we cannot ascertain that either opposite parties demanded exorbitant interest and penal charges or complainant has paid it. Hence, deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties is not proved. Hence complaint is dismissed without cost.
Extra copies to be taken back by parties without delay.
Pronounced by this Commission on this the 13th day of February, 2023.
Sd/-
SMT.ASAMOL P., MEMBER
Sd/-
SRI.C.SURESHKUMAR, PRESIDENT
Sd/-
SRI.AMPADY K.S., MEMBER
APPENDIX
Nil
Forwarded by Order
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.