West Bengal

North 24 Parganas

CC/535/2017

Hamid Begum W/o Miajuddin Mandal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Indus Ind Bank Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Ashim Karmakar

29 Oct 2024

ORDER

DCDRC North 24 Paraganas Barasat
Kolkata-700126.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/535/2017
( Date of Filing : 17 Oct 2017 )
 
1. Hamid Begum W/o Miajuddin Mandal
Mandal Para and Biswaspara, Kaikhali, Rajarhat, Kol-52
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Indus Ind Bank Ltd.
Chhoto Jagulia, Barasat Branch, 24 Pgs North
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Daman Prasad Biswas PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri Abhijit Basu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 29 Oct 2024
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

North 24 Pgs., BARASAT

C.C. No./535/2017

Date of Filing                         Date of Admission                 Date of Disposal

17.10.2017                                  23.10.2017                              29.10.2024

 

Complainant/s:-

Hamida Begum, W/o. Miajuddin Mandal, Mandal Para and Biswaspara, Kaikhali, Rajarhat, Dist-North 24 Pgs, Kolkata-700052.

-Vs.-

Opposite Party/s:-

Indus Ind Bank Ltd, Chhoto Jagulia, Barasat Br, Dist- North 24 Parganas, West Bengal.

P R E S E N T                        :- Sri. Daman Prosad Biswas……….President.

                                                :- Sri.  Abhijit Basu…………………. Member.

 

JUDGMENT /FINAL ORDER

 

            Complainant above named filed this complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the aforesaid Opposite Parties praying for direction to issue NOC, compensation amounting to Rs. 1,00,000/-, cost of the case and other reliefs.

 

            Opposite Parties appeared in this record and filed W/V.

 

Decisions with Reasons:-

 

            Case was admitted on 23/10/2017. Thereafter 25/09/2024 was fixed for filing questionnaire by the Complainant.  But on that date Complainant was absent without any steps.

 

            Complainant was asked to file Show Cause by 29/10/2024 as to why necessary order shall not be passed against her vide order no. 31 dated 25/09/2024.

 

            But on the next date i.e. on 29/10/2024 Complainant did not take any steps nor filed Show Cause as per order no. 31 dated 25/09/2024.

 

            Complainant did not produce original documents in support of her case, so this Commission is unable to decide this case on merit.

 

            The conduct of the Complainant indicates that she is not willing to proceed with this case.

            In this situation we have no other alternative but to dismiss the case.

 

In the result, present case fails.

Contd. To page no. 2 . . . ./

 

 

 

 

 

: :   2   : :

C.C. No./535/2017

 

Hence,

                        It is

                                    Ordered:-

 

that the present case be and the same vide no. CC/535/2017 is dismissed on contest against the Opposite Parties but without any order as to costs.

 

Let a copy of this order be supplied to both the parties free of cost as per CPR, 2005.

 

Dictated and Corrected by me

 

President

 

Member                                                                                  President

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Daman Prasad Biswas]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri Abhijit Basu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.