Haryana

Karnal

CC/267/2022

Manish Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Indostar Capital Finance Limited - Opp.Party(s)

V.K. Sharma

09 Oct 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.267 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.05.05.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:09.10.2023

 

Manish Kumar son of Kesha Ram, resident of house no.255, Kabri road, Hari Nagar, near Kacha Phatak, Panipat.

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

Indostar Capital Finance Limited, SCO no.234/235, 3^rd floor, above Muthoot Finance Company, Sector-12, Urban Estate, Karnal through its Manager.

 

                        ....Opposite party.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                               

Present:   None for the complainant.

                Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva, counsel for the OP.

                                                 

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the second last opportunity. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 04:00 PM. No further wait is justified.

                A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OP on 18.05.2022 and the case was adjourned for evidence of complainant. Thereafter, the complainant has availed several effective opportunities including last two opportunity for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.

                Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:09.10.2023.            

                        President,       

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)  

                             Member