Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/327/2022

Jaideep G Nair - Complainant(s)

Versus

Indigo Airlines - Opp.Party(s)

12 Nov 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

     SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      : PRESIDENT

  SMT.PREETHA G NAIR   : MEMBER

                                  SRI.VIJU.V.R                 : MEMBER

CC.NO.327/2022 (Filed on : 19/08/2022)

ORDER DATED : 12/11/2022

COMPLAINANTS

1. Jaideep.G.Nair,

S/o.Late N.Gangadharan Nair,

Residing at Anjali, TC No.2/1886,

VBGRA 24, Veerabhadra Gardens,

Pottakuzhy, Pattom,

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 004

2. Amritha.K.S

W/o. Jaideep.G.Nair,

Residing at Anjali, TC No.2/1886,

VBGRA 24, Veerabhadra Gardens,

Pottakuzhy, Pattom,

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 004

3. Sudha Devi,

W/o.Late N.Gangadharan Nair,

Residing at Anjali, TC No.2/1886,

VBGRA 24, Veerabhadra Gardens,

Pottakuzhy, Pattom,

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 004

4. Madhav.J.Nair,

S/o. Jaideep.G.Nair,

Residing at Anjali, TC No.2/1886,

VBGRA 24, Veerabhadra Gardens,

Pottakuzhy, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 004

5. Aaradhana.J.Nair,

D/o. Jaideep.G.Nair,

Residing at Anjali, TC No.2/1886,

VBGRA 24, Veerabhadra Gardens,

Pottakuzhy, Pattom,

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 004

(By Adv.Ram kiran.R)

565.  

OPPOSITE PARTIES

1. Indigo Airlines Private Limited,

Having its Registered Office at Central Wing,

Ground Floor, Thapar House – 124,

Janpath, New Delhi – 110001

Rep.by its Managing Director

 

2. Indigo Airlines Private Limited,

Trivandrum Office, Trivandrum

International Airport,

Shanghumugam, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 008

Rep.by its Branch Officer

 

3. Air travel Enterprises India Ltd (ATE)

Ground Floor, New Corporation Building,

Palayam, Thiruvananthapuram – 695033

Kerala, India

Rep.by its Managing Director

 

(OPS 1 & 2 by Adv.Suja Madhav)

(OP3 by Adv.Pradeep Lal.S)

ORDER

SMT.PREETHA.G.NAIR            :MEMBER

1. This complaint is filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2.       This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. When the case came up for consideration on 19/10/2022 both the parties submitted that there is a chance of settlement and hence the matter was referred to settlement talk to be held on 12/11/2022. On 12/11/2022 both the parties filed a compromise memo stating that the matter is settled for an amount of Rs.16,000/- (Rupees sixteen thousand only). As per the compromise memo the third opposite party has agreed to pay Rs.16,000/- (Rupees sixteen thousand only) to the complainant within 15 days from the date of settlement. The settlement memo signed and filed by the complainant is accepted and recorded. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the dispute we find that this is a fit case to be allowed in terms of the compromise.

          In the result, complaint is allowed in terms of compromise. The memo of settlement dated 12/11/2022 shall form part of this order.

                   A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

        Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 12^th day of November 2022.

 

                                                                                Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

 

 

                                                                                         Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

 

 

                                                                                             Sd/-

                          VIJU.V.R        : MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

Be/