Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/63/2018

Siva Saw Mills - Complainant(s)

Versus

Indian Overseas Bank - Opp.Party(s)

K.Ramanatha Reddy

31 Oct 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

                     

C.C. No.63/2018

DATED THE 31^ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2022

M/s. Siva Saw Mills,

Represented by its Proprietor,

Mr. K. S. Raguram,

No.14, West Raja Street,

Kancheepuram – 631 502.                                                                     .. Complainant.

- Versus -

1. Indian Overseas Bank,

Represented by its Chief Manager,

Kancheepuram Branch,

No.61, Gandhi Road,

Kancheepuram – 631 501.

 

2. Indian Overseas Bank,

Represented by its General Manager,

Central Office,

No.763, Anna Salai,

Chennai – 600 002.                                                                         .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant               : M/s. K. Ramanatha Reddy

Opposite parties                                 : Exparte

 

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 31.10.2022 for appearance of the complainant and for filing proof affidavit of the complainant (as last chance) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                      

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for the complainant.  This matter adjourned for filing proof affidavit of the complainant for several hearings.  Though sufficient opportunities were given to the complainant, he has neither appeared nor filed his proof affidavit.

Today, this matter is posted for appearance of complainant and for filing proof affidavit of the complainant as last chance or for dismissal.  

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M. there was no representation for complainant.   Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M. but the complainant has neither represented nor filed his proof affidavit.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the consumer complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this consumer complaint is dismissed for default for non-filing of proof affidavit.   No costs.

 

 

 

               Sd/-                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                         PRESIDENT