NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2886/2018

C. RENUKA - Complainant(s)

Versus

INDIAN BANK & 3 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

03 Jan 2019

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2886 OF 2018
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Appeal No. 676/2014 of the State Commission Telangana)
1. C. RENUKA
7-186/2, SAMATA NAGAR, OLD BOWENPALLY, SECUNDRABAD
HYDERABAD-500011
TELANGANA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. INDIAN BANK & 3 ORS.
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CORPORATE OFFICE, 260, AWAI SHANMUGAM SALAI ROYAPETTAH,
CHENNAI-600014
2. ZONAL MANAGER, INDIAN BANK
ZONAL OFFICE, 4TH FLOOR, LIBERTY PLAZA, HIMAYATNAGAR
HYDERABAD-500029
TELANGANA
3. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT BY ITS PRESIDENT HYDERABAD II, 94/B/2, NH65, CHANDRA VIHAR, OLD KATTAL MANDI, ABIDS
HYDERABAD-500457
TELANGANA
4. TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
HYDERABAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT ERUVAKA BUILDING ANAND NAGAR COLONY, KHAIRTABAD
HYDERABAD-500004
TELANGANA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL,PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. M. SHREESHA,MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. D. Surendranath, A/R
For the Respondent :

Dated : 03 Jan 2019
ORDER

Heard Mr. D. Surendranath, A/R of the Petitioners.

 

        Present Revision Petitions have been filed with a delay of 318 days.  In the Applications seeking condonation of delay, it has been stated that the Petitioners had approached the Andhra Pradesh High Court at Hyderabad by filing a Writ Petition, which had been dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.  It may be mentioned here that the State Commission had passed the impugned order on 11.5.2017.  Petitioners, according to their own averment made in Para-5 of the Applications, stated that they came to know in November 2017 that the order passed by the State Commission can be challenged by means of a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Andhra Pradesh High Court.  However, this Writ Petition was filed only in the month of July 2018.  There is no explanation whatsoever as to what the Petitioners were doing from November 2017 to June 2018.  In our considered opinion, the Petitioners have failed to offer reasonable explanation for delay in filing the Revision Petitions.

        The Applications seeking condonation of delay are therefore dismissed.  Consequently, the Revision Petitions are dismissed.

 
......................J
R.K. AGRAWAL
PRESIDENT
......................
M. SHREESHA
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.