Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/18/30

K V Sreelatha - Complainant(s)

Versus

Indian Airlines - Opp.Party(s)

30 Aug 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/18/30
( Date of Filing : 24 Jan 2018 )
 
1. K V Sreelatha
TC 40/1061,manacadu,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Indian Airlines
Ground floor,thapar house,New Delhi
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No. 30/2018 Filed on 24/01/2018

ORDER DATED 30/08/2022

 

Complainant

:

K.V.Sreelatha, TC.40/1061, Vijai, Manacaud.P.O, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 009.

        (By Adv.Sandeep.T.George)

Opposite parties

:

  1. Authorized Signatory, M/s.Indigo Airlines, Indigo, Central Wing, Ground Floor, Thapar House, 124 Janpath Road, New Delhi – 110 001.
  2. The Manager, M/s. Indigo Airlines, Thiruvananthapuram Domestic Terminal, Shanghumugham, Beach.P.O, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 008.

(By Adv.Narayan.R)

  1. The Proprietor, Oum Travels, 11/56, Sadar Bazar, Delhi CANTT, New Delhi – 110 010.

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter thecommission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.  After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties.  The opposite parties entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegation raised by the complainant.  As the complainant was continuously absent a notice was issued to the complainant to appear before this Commission today to further proceed with this complaint.  The said notice was accepted by the complainant.  When the case came up for consideration today, complainant was absent and counsel for the complainant reported no instructions.  In the above circumstances we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint.

In the result complaint is dismissed for default.  There will be no order as to cost.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 30th   day of August,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.