NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1152/2010

M/S. INSCOL HOSPITAL & ORS. - Complainant(s)

Versus

INDERJEET ARORA & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. RAKESH BHATIA

26 Mar 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 22 Mar 2010

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1152/2010
(Against the Order dated 16/02/2010 in Appeal No. 50/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)
1. M/S. INSCOL HOSPITAL & ORS.SCO No. 18-19, Sector 34-AChandigarh2. MR. DALJIT SINGH GUJRAL, MANAGING DIRECTORM/s. Inscol Healthcare Ltd., SCO No. 18-19, Sector - 34-AChandigarh3. MR. P.S. MANNM/s. Inscol Healthcare Ltd, SCO No. 18-19, Sector - 34-AChandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. INDERJEET ARORA & ORS.R/o. 6183, Modern Housing Complex ManimajraChandigarh2. DR. JAYANT BANERJEEM/s. Inscol Healthcare Ltd, SCO No. 18-19, Sector - 34-AChandigarh3. MRS. ALVEENA SAMSONHouse No. 843, Phase IVMohaliPunjab4. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CORP.Through its Manager, SCO No. 123-124, Sector 17-BChandigarh ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.P. SINGH ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 26 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

       
          Petitioners have come in revision against interim order passed by State Commission. It seems that when petitioners approached State Commission for stay of operation of impugned order, State Commission while staying operation of impugned order directed petitioners to deposit 50% of awarded amount with District Forum with liberty to respondent to withdraw aforesaid amount after furnishing adequate security. Despite all persuasions, we find no merit. Revision petition is accordingly dismissed.          
 
 


......................JB.N.P. SINGHPRESIDING MEMBER
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER