Haryana

Rohtak

CC/21/301

Umesh Kumar Advocate - Complainant(s)

Versus

IGNOU (Indira Gandhi National Open University) - Opp.Party(s)

Complainant In Person

11 Oct 2021

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.
Haryana.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/301
( Date of Filing : 13 Apr 2021 )
 
1. Umesh Kumar Advocate
aged 37 years, Chamber No. 201, District Courts, Rohtak.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. IGNOU (Indira Gandhi National Open University)
Help Center, R/o Ramphal Chowk road, Sector-7, Dwarka, New Delhi, Delhi-110045.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian PRESIDENT
  Mrs. Tripti Pannu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 11 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak.

 

                                                                        Complaint No. : 301.

                                                                        Instituted on     : 13.04.2021.

                                                                        Decided on       :  11.10.2021

 

Umesh Kumar Advocate, aged 37 years, Chamber No.201, District Courts, Rohtak.

                                                                                    …..Complainant.

                                                Vs.

IGNOU( Indira Gandhi National Open University) Help Center, R/o Ramphal Chowk Road, Sector-7, Dwarka, New Delhi, Delhi-110045.                                                                                                                                  ……….Opposite parties.

 

Present:          Sh. Umesh Kumar, Advocate complainant in person.

                        Sh. Dharamvir Singh Dahiya, Advocate for the opposite party.

 

                        Complainant made a statement that he made party IGNOU Help Center for providing wrong solved assignment, but concerned Postman sent the Court notice to IGNOU, New Delhi. He further stated that respondent i.e. IGNOU, New Delhi appeared and he satisfied that Court notice delivered wrongly to IGNOU, New Delhi instead of IGNOU, Help Center. He further stated that he withdraws the present petition as he has no grievance with the University and its Officials and requested to disposed off the petition.

                        As per the statement given by the complainant, the postman has wrongly delivered the court notice to IGNOU, New Delhi. We have perused the summons issued by this Commission. Upon the summon, the address is same which has been mentioned in the complainant by the complainant. The complainant has not placed on record any document to prove this fact that this summon has been delivered on a wrong address. Hence this pleading in the statement has been turned down. Moreover, the complainant has withdrawn the present complaint.

            In view of the statement made by the complainant, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

                        File be consigned to the record after due compliance.

Dated : 11.10.2021

 

 

Member                                                                                 President

                                                                                                DCDRC, Rohtak

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Mrs. Tripti Pannu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.