E.A. No. 53 of 2015

Arun Kumar          Vs   Iffco Tokio    

Present:       DH in person.

Sh. Satender, Advocate proxy counsel of

Sh. A. Sardana, Advocate for JD no. 1.

None for JD no. 2.

                    Learned proxy counsel for JD no. 1  stated that an amount of Rs. 43282/- has been paid to the DH vide cheque dated 23.05.2016 through his counsel Mr. Om Parmar who has also issued receipt in token of receipt of the cheque as full and final satisfaction of the order dated 07.01.2015.  He has moved an application in this regard alongwith photo copy of receipt and prayed for the dismissal of the execution as full and final settlement.

                    In view of the statement of the counsel for the JD no. 1, the execution application of the DH is dismissed being fully satisfied. File be consigned to the record room.

President,

                                                            District Consumer Disputes

                                                            Redressal Forum, Bhiwani.

                                                                      13.06.2016.

Member.