Haryana

Karnal

CC/486/2020

Satish Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Harbans Lal Rana

08 Sep 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.486 of 2020

                                                          Date of instt.04.11.2020

                                                          Date of Decision:08.09.2022

 

Satish Kumar son of Sh. Shyam Lal resident of village naurta tehsil Indri district Karnal.

...…Complainant

                                        Versus

  1. Iffco Tokio general insurance company Ltd. having its office at SCO No.19-20, ground floor, hafed district office, sector-12, part-1, Karnal through its branch manager.
  2. Indusind Bank ltd. SCO No.254, 3rd floor, sector-12, part-1, opposite mini secretariat Karnal through its branch manager.

                        ....Opposite parties.

                                             

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before      Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Smt. Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

 

Present:  None for the complainant.

                Sh. Naveen Khetarpal, counsel for the OP-1.

              

                Today the case is fixed for notice to the OP-2. On careful perusal of the file, it reveals that since November, 2020, complainant has failed to get the service effected to the OP-2. No anyone has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant. Position remained the same on the adjourned date. Case called several times since morning. It is already 04:00 PM. It appears that complainant is no more interested to pursue his case. There is no justification to adjourn the case further for the same purpose as complaint pertains to year 2020.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:08.09.2022             

                                President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.