Haryana

Karnal

CC/696/2021

Hakam Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Robin Gandhi

27 Jul 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.696 of 2021

                                                          Date of instt.13.12.2021

                                                          Date of Decision:27.07.2023

 

Hakam Singh son of Sh. Bhim Singh, resident of village Sohana, Post Office Sekbupura, District Karnal.

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd., Iffco Sadan, C-1, Saket New Delhi-110017, through its Manager.
2. The Branch Manager, Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd., Sector-12, Karnal.

 

                        ....Opposite parties.

            

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

               

Present:  None for the complainant.

       Sh. Mohit Goyal, counsel for the OPs.

                                         

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the last opportunity. No one has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant nor evidence produced. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 04:00 PM. No wait is justified.

                A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs on 05.05.2022 and the case was adjourned for evidence of complainant. Thereafter, the complainant has availed four effective opportunities including last opportunity for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.

                Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified at it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:27.07.2023.            

                           President,       

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member