Chandigarh

DF-I

CP/85/2010

Manjinder Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co.Ltd. Customer Service Centre-North IFFCO House, Ground Floor 34, Ne - Opp.Party(s)

Rekha Kant

06 Aug 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 85 of 2010
1. Manjinder SinghS/o Sh. Surinder Singh age 35 Yrs permanent R/o House No. 163 Suncity Colony Railon Road, Ropar Punjab Presently Residing at House No. 3301 Sector-23/D, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co.Ltd. Customer Service Centre-North IFFCO House, Ground Floor 34, Nehru Place New Delhi-110019New Delhi2. IFFCO-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Customer Service Centre-NorthIffco-House, Ground Floor 34, Nehru Place New Delhi-1100193. IFFKO-Tokio General Insurance Co.Ltd.Plot no. 2B & C sector-28/A Madhya Marg, Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Rekha Kant, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 06 Aug 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

                                               

Criminal Complaint No. 85 of 2010

in

Complaint Case No. 1394 of 2009

 

 

Manjinder Singh

                                                                                                  - Complainant

                                                Versus

 

1.         IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd., Chandigarh.

2.            IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi.

 

                                                                                                - Opposite Parties

Present:         Sh.Vikramjit S.Saini, Advocate for Complainant.

                        Sh.Raj Karan, Advocate for OPs.

 

Dated, the 6th day of August, 2010.

                                                            ORDER

                          In view of the statement made by counsel for complainant, this execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. The complainant would be at liberty to file fresh execution application as & when the stay order is vacated by the Hon’ble State Commission or after the decision of FA No.190 of 2010, if need be.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

                                                                                                PRESIDING OFFICER

            LOK ADALAT.

 

 

 

3rd MEMBER                         2nd MEMBER                   1st MEMBER



MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER