Ritu Vs. IFFCO TOKIO

Present:       Sh. Pardeep Saini, Advocate for complainant.                                                        Sh.Anurag Malik Advocate for the opposite parties.

                   File put up on application moved by learned counsel for the complainant for withdraw the case and for permission to file fresh complaint after passing order to put up the file. Ld. Counsel for the complainant has made a statement that due to some technical defects he does not want to proceed with the present complaint and as such has stated to withdraw the same and has sought permission to file the case afresh in appropriate court and benefit u/s 14(2) of Limitation Act.

                   In view of the above statement, present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn. The complainant is at liberty to seek the remedy in appropriate Court of law. Original documents if any placed on record by the complainant be returned and photocopy of the same be placed on record. However, the complainant may seek exemption/condonation of delay under section 14 (2) of the Limitation Act for the period during which the proceedings remained pending before this Consumer Commission.

                        Copy of this order be supplied to both the parties free of costs. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Dated:02.01.2023

                                    Member               Member                         President

                                                                                         DCDRC, Rohtak