Haryana

StateCommission

A/952/2016

NARENDER JEET - Complainant(s)

Versus

IFFCO TOKIO GEN.INSURANCE CO. - Opp.Party(s)

H.S.SANDHU

21 Nov 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                 

First Appeal No.    952 of 2016

Date of Institution:  10.10.2016

Date of Decision:    21.11.2016

 

Narender Jeet son of Shri Nanha Ram, resident of V.P.O. Udana, Tehsil Indri, District Karnal.

Appellant-Complainant.

 

Versus

 

1.      Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., Registered Office Iffco Sadan, CI, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi-1110007 through its authorized signatory.

 

2.      Sachdeva Beema Kendra & Car Loan, Mehta Market, Near Bus Stand, Indri, District Karnal through its proprietor Sh. Avinash Sachdeva.

 

Respondents-Opposite Parties.

 

 

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

                         

 

Present:     Mr. Saurabh Arora, proxy counsel for Mr. Harinder Singh Sandhu, counsel for the appellant.

Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, counsel for the respondent No.1.

                  

                            

O R D E R

 

 NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

The instant appeal has been filed by Narender Jeet–complainant against the order dated June 15^th, 2016 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Karnal (for short ‘District Forum’) whereby, the complaint was dismissed in default.

2.      Learned counsel for the appellant has urged that the counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant before the District Forum wrongly noted the date, due to which he could not appear on the date fixed and the complaint was dismissed in default. 

3.      He further urged that the impugned order be set aside and complaint be restored at its original number.

4.      Be that as it may, without delving deeper, this Commission deems it appropriate to restore the complaint.  The appeal is accepted and the impugned order is set-aside. The complaint is restored to the board of District Forum for adjudication.

5.      The District Forum is directed to issue notice to the parties and shall proceed in accordance with law.

6.      Copy of this order be sent to the District Forum.

  

 

Announced 21.11.2016

(Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member

(B.M. Bedi) Judicial Member

(Nawab Singh) President

D.R.