Haryana

Karnal

33/2014

Subhash Chand S/o Nourata Ram - Complainant(s)

Versus

Iffco -Tokio General Insurance Co., Iffco- Tokio General Insurance Company - Opp.Party(s)

S. K. Chaudhary

19 Mar 2015

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. 33/2014
 
1. Subhash Chand S/o Nourata Ram
H.No. 36-A, Gali No.2, Rajiv Puram Karnal
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No . 33of 2014

Date of instt.   07.02.2014

                                                          Date of decision: 19.03.2015

 

Subhash chand Son of Nourata Ram resident of H.No. 36-A, Gali No.2, Rajiv Puram Karnal Haryana 132001.

                                                                 ………Complainant.

                                                Vs.

  1. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company, ltd. Iffco house 3rd floor, 34 Nehru palace New Delhi 110019 through its Divisional manager.
  2.  Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company, Ltd Sector 12 UE, Karnal though its Divisional Manager.                                                                                                                                                           ………Opposite Parties.

 

                   Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer

                   Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.Subhash Goyal……. President.

                   Smt. Shashi Sharma  ……. Member.

 

 Present        None for the complainant.

                   Sh.Y.P.Arora Advocate for the Ops.

ORDER:

                  

                   Today was the last opportunity for the evidence of the complainant. The case called several times since morning but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. The complainant has already availed several opportunities for his evidence including last opportunity and it seems that the complainant is no more interested in prosecuting the present complaint. It is already 4.00PM. Further wait is not justified. Therefore, the present complaint is dismissed in default .The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

 

                  

Announced:

19.03.2015                                                                                                                                                      

                                                                                      (Subhash Goyal)

                                                                                            President,

             (Smt. Shashi Sharma )                                          District Consumer Disputes

                    (Member)                                                      Redressal Forum, Karnal

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.