Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/200/2014

M/s.Neeraja - Complainant(s)

Versus

IFB Industries Ltd(Home Appliance Division) - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

25 Jan 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,
CHENNAI (SOUTH)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/200/2014
 
1. M/s.Neeraja
Paruthipattu, Chn - 71.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. IFB Industries Ltd(Home Appliance Division)
Vadapalani, Chn - 26.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML., PRESIDENT
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   07.04.2014

                                                                        Date of Order :   25.01.2016

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI(SOUTH)

     2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM M.A.M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

                 DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

 

C.C.NO.200/2014

            MONDAY THIS  25TH DAY OF JANUARY  2016     

Mrs. Neeraja,

W/o. N. Vijay,

Plot No.27, 5th Cross Street,

Sriram Nagar, Phase-II,

Paruthipattu,

Chennai 600 071.                                                   ..Complainant

                                            ..Vs..

1. The Manager,

IFB Industries Limited,

(Home Appliances Division),

No.6, Arcot Road, Vadapalani,

Chennai 600 026.

 

2. The Manager,

I-Matrix Consultancy,

Franchisee, IFB Industries Limited,

No.123, MTH Road, 1st Floor,

Indian Bank Upstairs,

Ambattur,

Chennai 600 053.                                                ..Opposite parties. 

                                             

For the Complainant                    :   Party-in person.  

For the Opposite party-1              :   Exparte.  

For the opposite party-2               :  Dismissed.

 

          Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986.  Complaint is filed seeking direction against the opposite parties to claim a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and also to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- as mental agony and Rs.5,000/- as cost of the complaint to the  complainant.

 

ORDER

THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM PRESIDENT

       

No representation for complainant, Complainant neither appeared nor filed proof affidavit despite of several adjournments, hence  complainant called absent, this complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.

 
 
[ B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML.,]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.