NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1703/2010

PRAKASH VERMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

IDEA CELLULAR LTD. & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. BHARAT BHUSHAN

21 May 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1703 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 10/02/2010 in Appeal No. 295/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)
1. PRAKASH VERMA114/4, North MusakhediIndoreMadhya Pradesh ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. IDEA CELLULAR LTD. & ANR.139-140, Electronic Complex, PardeshipuraIndoreMadhya Pradesh - 5420102. MR. UDAI VEER SINGH, NODAL OFFICER-"IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED"C/o. BTA Cell Com. Limited, 139-140, Electronic Complex, PardeshipuraIndoreMadhya Pradesh - 542010 ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :MR. BHARAT BHUSHAN
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 21 May 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

            Fora below have dismissed the complaint filed by the petitioner relying upon the judgement of Supreme Court in General Manager Telecom vs. M.Krishnan & Anr. – (2009)8 SCC 481 wherein it has been held that any dispute between the subscriber and the telegraph authority can be resolved by taking recourse to arbitration proceedings only. 

The judgement of the Supreme Court is binding on all the subordinate courts.  There is no scope for interference.  Dismissed.

 



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER