Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/388/2011

Som Nath - Complainant(s)

Versus

IDBI Federal Life Insurance Co. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Ishwar Lal, Manmohan Upneja

13 Jul 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 388 of 2011
1. Som Nathaged 61 Years, S/o Sh.Santu Ram R/o # 20, E/A Gobind Colony, Rajpura, Distt. Patiala. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. IDBI Federal Life Insurance Co. Ltd.,Regd. Office 1st Floor, Tradeview, Oasis Complex, Kanla City, P.B.Marg, Lower Parel(W)-Mumbai-400013 through its Managing Director/Chairman.2. IDBI Federal Life Insurance Co. Ltd.SCO.134/135/136, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh through its Branch Manager.3. Mr. Rajiv Kaushik (agent IDBI),C/o Sh. Sandeep Sharma, House No. 285, Dalmia Vihar, Rajpura 140401 (Punjab). ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Ishwar Lal, Manmohan Upneja, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 13 Jul 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.388 of 2011

 

Som Nath              Vs.              IDBI Federal Life Insurance Co. & ors.

 

PRESENT:

 

Ms.Anupam, Counsel for Complainant.

Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Proxy counsel for Sh.Onkar Singh, Counsel for OP No.1 & 2.

OP No.3 already ex-parte.

 

Dated the 13th day of July, 2012

 

ORDER

 

 

            Counsel for complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves his right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the Forum having competent jurisdiction in the matter”.

 

            In view of the statement made by counsel for complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the Forum having competent jurisdiction in the matter, as per law.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

            Sd/-                                         Sd/-                                         Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)       (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           (MADHU MUTNEJA)

            MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT                                MEMBER

 


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER