Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/17/243

SHYAM SHARMA S/O VISHNUKUMAR SHARMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED - Opp.Party(s)

ADV.G.L.BAJAJ

29 Nov 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCH
NAGPUR
 
First Appeal No. A/17/243
( Date of Filing : 21 Jun 2017 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/02/2017 in Case No. RBT/CC/13/740 of District Additional DCF, Nagpur)
 
1. SHYAM SHARMA S/O VISHNUKUMAR SHARMA
R/O. PLOT NUMBER 78, OPPOSITE SHIV MANDIR, JARIPATKA, NAGPUR-440 014
NAGPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. ICICI PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
HEAD OFFICE AT VINOD SILK ILLS COMPOUND, CHAKRAVARTHY ASHOK ROAD, ASHOK NAGAR, KANDIVALI, EAST, MUMBAI-400 101
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, ICICI PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT LOTUS, WEST HIGH COURT ROAD, DHARAMPETH, NAGPUR-440 010
NAGPUR
MAHARASHTRA
3. SATHY RAJSHEKHAR
ICICI PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, LOTUS WEST HIGH COURT ROAD, DHARAMPETH NAGPUR-440010
NAGPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. B.A.SHAIKH PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. S B SAWARKAR MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Advocate Mr.Anurag Jain for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
 
Dated : 29 Nov 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Per Shri B.A.Shaikh, Hon’ble Presiding Member.

        No one for the appellant is present. Advocate Mr.Anurag Jain is present for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Perusal of the record and proceedings of the appeal shows that no one appeared for the appellants since 22/03/2011 though the appeal came to be adjourned number of times i.e. on 22/03/2018, 04/07/2018, 03/08/2018, 21/09/2018 and 29/10/2018. On last date i.e. on 29/10/2018 this Commission observed that appeal deserves to be dismissal for want of prosecution. The appeal was therefore adjourned till this date for appropriate order. It is also seen that notice issued to respondent No.3 has been returned unserved long back with postal endorsement as “incomplete address”. However the appellant has not taken any step to provide complete address of the respondent No.3 for service of notice, since long. Therefore we hold that the appeal deserves to be dismissed in default. Hence appeal is dismissed in default.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. B.A.SHAIKH]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. S B SAWARKAR]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.