Chandigarh

DF-II

EA/49/2012

Anita Rani Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

15 Mar 2013

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 49 of 2012
1. Anita Rani Sharmaw/o Ravinder K. Sharma r/o H.No. 696, Sector 7, Panchkula, Haryana ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 15 Mar 2013
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

Execution Application No.49 of 2012 in

Consumer Complaint No.770 of 2010

 

Anita Rani Sharma           Vs.     I.C.I.C.I. Prudential Life Insurance                                                       Company Ltd. & anr.

PRESENT:

Sh.I.S.Pabla, Counsel for Complainant.

Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Counsel for OPs.

  

Dated the 15th day of March, 2013

ORDER

            A letter bearing memo No.ACG-I/RA/RC/42, dated 07.03.2013 alongwith cheque No.094899, dated 02.03.2013 for a sum of Rs.1,323,336/- in favour of Anita Rani Sharma, has been received from Office of Assistant Collector, Grade-I, U.T. Chandigarh.

            Counsel for OPs has made an oral request that handing over the cheque be kept in abeyance as they have filed revision petition before the Hon’ble National Commission, which is pending for 04.04.2013 for obtaining the stay. This request is opposed.

            No stay order has been received by this Forum staying the payment of the amount in question. Further, mere filing of the revision petition does not operate as stay against the execution. Therefore, there is no merit in this request of OP and the same is declined.         

            Sh.I.S.Pabla, Counsel for Complainant, has received the cheque of Rs.1,323,336.00 and has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“I have received cheque No.094899, dated 02.03.2013 for a sum of Rs.1,323,336.00 in favour of Anita Rani Sharma drawn on ICICI Bank, in compliance of the order of the Hon’ble State Commission, U.T. Chandigarh, dated 13.07.2012. Now, I do not press this execution application. It be dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied.”

 

            In view of the said statement of counsel for complainant, this execution application is dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied.

            The certificate issued under Section 25(3) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to the concerned District Collectors, if any, be called back.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

                        Sd/-                                                                  Sd/-

            (MADHU MUTNEJA)                                          (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)

            MEMBER                                                          PRESIDING MEMBER

 


, MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, PRESIDING MEMBER ,