Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/141/2018

K. Dhandapani - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI Lomboard General insurance company Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.v. Raghavachari

28 Oct 2022

ORDER

          STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                   BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                       Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 FA. No. 141/2018

(As against order in CC.No.186/2015 dated 30.11.2016, on the file of

DCDRC, Coimbatore)

 

                                                          DATED THIS THE 28^TH  DAY OF OCTOBER 2022

 

D.Dhandapani,

S/o Kandasamy Chettiyar,

Door No. 37,

Nehru colony,

Mahalingam post,

Pollachi,

Coimbatore District                                            ..Appellant/complainant

 

                                         Vs

 

1. The International Assistance Co-coordinator,

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd,

C/o Eurpo Assistance India Pvt.Ltd,

301, C-wing, Business Square,

Anderi Kurla Road, Chakala,

Andheri(West), Mumbai 400 093  

 

2.  ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd,

Represented by its Executive Manager,

Building No.11,

Link Road,

Malad(west),

Mumbai – 400 064                                        ..Respondents/opposite parties

 

Counsel for the Appellant/complainant              : M/s V.Raghavachari

Counsel for the Respondents/ops 1 & 2            : M/s S.S.Sajeev Kesan

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                  

                                            Docket order

     No representation for appellant. Respondents 1 and 2 present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present hence passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

        Sd/-                                                                                                                  Sd/-

R VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                         PRESIDENT