Circuit Bench Asansol

StateCommission

IA/44/2019

Swapan Chakraborty - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd and another - Opp.Party(s)

Arnab Mukherjee

31 Jul 2019

ORDER

ASANSOL CIRCUIT BENCH
of
WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KSTP COMMUNITY HALL , DAKSHIN DHADKA
ASANSOL, PASCHIM BURDWAN - 713302
 
Interlocutory Application No. IA/44/2019
( Date of Filing : 29 May 2019 )
In
First Appeal No. A/29/2019
(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/02/2019 in Case No. 48/18 of District Purulia)
 
1. Swapan Chakraborty
Son of Sri Manbodh Chakraborty,resident of Village and Post-Cheliama,P.S.Raghunathpur,District-Purulia,
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd and another
Registered Office ICICI Lombard House,414 Veer Savarkar Marg,Near Siddhi Vinayak Temple,Pravadevi,Mumbai-400025
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. KAMAL DE PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. ASHIS KUMAR BASU MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Arnab Mukherjee, Advocate
For the Respondent:
Dated : 31 Jul 2019
Final Order / Judgement

HON'BLE MR. KAMAL DE PRESIDING MEMBER 

Order No. : 03

Date : 31.07.2019

Parties are present through their Ld. Lawyers.

Today is fixed for hearing of the IA case being No. IA/44/2019.

Ld. Lawyer for the respondent files a petition praying for time and subsequently, he not presses the petition.

The petition for time is rejected being “not pressed”.

Heard Ld. Lawyers of both sides. Considered.

The instant IA Case is filed for condonation of delay.

In filing the Memo of Appeal, it is stated that CC/48/2018 before the Ld. District Forum, Purulia was dismissed on 21.02.2019. The appellant came to know about the impugned order on 14.03.2019. The appellant requested the Ld. Lawyer to apply for getting the certified copy of the order. The certified copy of the order was made ready for delivery on 18.03.2019 and delivered on 19.03.2019.

It is stated that the complainant became ill since 17.03.2019 and accordingly could not contact the Ld. Lawyer.

The appellant, however, on recovery contacted the Ld. Lawyer on 26.04.2019 and the present Appeal is filed on 29.05.2019.

The complainant was under treatment from 17.03.2019 to 26.04.2019 and the Ld. Lawyers abstained from work according to Bar resolution from 25.04.2019 to 28.05.2019, and for that the complainant could not file the Appeal in time.

The appellant states that the appellant will be highly prejudiced if the prayer for condonation of delay is not entertained by the Hon’ble Commission.

Perused the case record, it appears that there has been a delay of 62 days excluding the period of limitation and delivery of certified copy of the impugned order.

It also appears that the Ld. Lawyers abstained from work for a considerable period.

Considering all aspects, we feel inclined to allow the petition for condonation of delay subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2000/- payable to Consumer Legal Aid Account, Asansol.

Fix 22.08.2019 for payment of cost. 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. KAMAL DE]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. ASHIS KUMAR BASU]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.