Haryana

Panipat

CC/380/2023

M/s E Derma Pharma India Pvt. Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Shri Rahul Jindal

16 Dec 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/380/2023
( Date of Filing : 06 Nov 2023 )
 
1. M/s E Derma Pharma India Pvt. Ltd.
Through its Director Dr. Raj Narayan aged 59 years, having its office at 1052, Sector 12, HUDA, Near Mittal Mega Mall, Panipat. (Aadhar No.7139 4885 5350)
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Having its registered office at ICICI Lombard House, 414, veer Savarkar Marg, Near Siddhi Vanayak Mandir, Prabhadevi, Mumbai- 400025, through its General Manager.
2. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Having its Branch Office at SCO 17, First Floor, Sector 25, HUDA Truck Union, Near Malik Petrol Pump, Panipat - 132103, through its Branch Manager.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Dr. R. K. Dogra PRESIDENT
  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary MEMBER
  Mr. Vinit Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Shri Rahul Jindal, Advocate for the complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Shri Rajnish Kumar Trehan, Advocate for opposite parties.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 16 Dec 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                    No evidence of complainant is present. A date is requested on behalf of the complainant, which is opposed. Heard. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 23.05.2024 and today is last opportunity. No effort has been made by the complainant to produce the evidence. Moreso, the complainant has already availed four effective opportunities including last opportunity. Hence, there are no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by order of this Commission.

 2.               This complaint has been filed against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties. In written statement, all the allegations have been denied by the opposite parties and dismissal of the complaint was prayed for.

3.                As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove his case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs.

4.                This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the record-room.

 
 
[ Dr. R. K. Dogra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Dr. Rekha Chaudhary]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Mr. Vinit Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.