Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

CC/17/2011

DAMODAR V. GURAV - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

OM ASSOCIATES

16 Apr 2014

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/17/2011
 
1. DAMODAR V. GURAV
MUDHAL TAL BHUDARGAD
KOLHAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
ZENITH HOUSE K.K.RD. MAHALAXMI
MUMBAI 34
MAHARASHTRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT
  Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:OM ASSOCIATES, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
ORDER

Order Below Exhibit 1

PER SHRI. S.B.DHUMAL - HON’BLE PRESIDENT :
         Read order passed below delay condonation of application. Even according to the Complainant, delay of more than 2 years and 11 months is caused in filing of this complaint. The Complainant has failed to assign sufficient ground to condone the delay. Therefore, delay condonation application no.03/2011 is rejected. Hence, present complaint is dismissed as it is hopelessly barred by law of limitation. No order as to cost.
 
 
[ SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.