Haryana

Sirsa

CC/23/402

Chhotu Ram - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI Lombard Gen Insu. - Opp.Party(s)

Mukesh Arya

16 Oct 2023

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/23/402
( Date of Filing : 11 Oct 2023 )
 
1. Chhotu Ram
Village Kutiana Distt Sirsa
Sirsa
Haryana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ICICI Lombard Gen Insu.
House NO 414 Veer Savarkar Marg Near Siddhi Vinayak Temple Mumbai
Mumbai
Maharashrta
2. PNB Bank
Branch VPO Jamal Nathusari Chopta Distt Sirsa
Sirsa
Haryana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Padam Singh Thakur PRESIDENT
  Sukhdeep Kaur MEMBER
  O.P Tuteja MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mukesh Arya, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 16 Oct 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Chhotu Ram     vs.  ICICI Lomabrd GIC etc.

Dated: 16.10.2023

Present: -     Sh. Mukesh Arya, Advocate for applicant/ complainant.

Heard on the point of maintainability of complaint being beyond limitation of two years.

The complainant has filed this complaint against the opposite parties seeking insurance claim for the loss of his cotton crop of Kharif, 2017. As such complainant has filed this complaint after long delay as the crop of complainant which was damaged pertained to the year 2017 and cause of action arose to the complainant in year 2018. Although complainant has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the present complaint but the perusal of file reveals that complainant got issued legal notice to the ops in the month of June, 2019, meaning thereby that complainant has contacted counsel and even after consultation no complaint has been filed within prescribed period of limitation of two years and more so there is no sufficient cause or explanation by justifiable grounds to file this complaint on 10.10.2023. The delay has not been explained with sufficient cause to institute this complaint after expiry of limitation period as per provisions of Section 69 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The learned counsel for complainant relied upon order of the Hon’ble Apex Court dated 10.01.2022 passed in Misc. Application No.21 of 2022 with other misc. applications vide which the limitation for the period of COVID-19 pandemic i.e. from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 was excluded but even after exclusion of period 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 the complainant failed to file the present complaint in time. There is no sufficient cause to condone the delay as period of more than one year and seven months after 28.02.2022 and five years from the cause of action have elapsed. As such the application for condonation of delay in filing the present complaint is hereby dismissed and accordingly the complaint is also dismissed in limine being barred by limitation. A copy of this order be supplied to the complainant as per rules. File be consigned to the record room.     

 

Announced:                             Member      Member                President          

Dt. 16.10.2023.                                                                    DCDRC, Sirsa.

 

 
 
[ Padam Singh Thakur]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Sukhdeep Kaur]
MEMBER
 
 
[ O.P Tuteja]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.