Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/617/2023

P Praveen kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI lambard general insurance - Opp.Party(s)

22 Feb 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

               SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN           : PRESIDENT

          SMT.PREETHA G NAIR     : MEMBER

                                      SRI.VIJU.V.R                      : MEMBER

CC.NO.617/2023 (Filed on : 24/11/2023)

ORDER DATED : 16/02/2024

COMPLAINANT

P.Praveen kumar,

Pranavam, Ooralikonam,

Moozhi Panvoor.P.O

Nedumangad,

Thiruvananthapuram

Pin – 695568

(Party in person)

VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

  1. Authorized Signatory,

ICICI Lambard,

General Insurance Company Ltd,

TC 15/1805 (1) Ground Floor,

Mahesh Estates, Vazhuthacaud,

Thiruvananthapuram – 695014

(OP1 by Adv.Prasanna kumar Nair)

  1. The Manager,

South Indian Bank,

  •  

Nedumangad Branch,

Thiruvananthapuram

Pin code - 695568

(OP2 by Adv.B.Vasudevan Nair)

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      :PRESIDENT

1. This complaint is filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2. This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite parties. First opposite party entered appearance and filed vakalath. Notice issued to second opposite party was also served and hence the case was adjourned to 22/02/2024 for appearance of the second opposite party and version of opposite parties 1 & 2.  Meanwhile the complainant filed a memo dated 16/02/2024 stating that he has received Rs.90,000/- (Rupees ninety thousand only) from the first opposite party towards the payment of the subject matter of this complaint. The complainant further submitted that in view of the payment of Rs.90,000/- (Rupees ninety thousand only) by the first opposite party he is not willing to further proceed with this complaint. The case now stands posted to 22/02/2024 for appearance of the parties. In order to consider the memo filed by the complainant, this commission suo moto advanced this case from 22/02/2024 to this date. The memo filed by the complainant is accepted and recorded. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the proceedings, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled.

                       In the result, the complaint is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

                       A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

              Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 16th day of February 2024.

                                                                           Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN       : PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                      Sd/-

PREETHA G NAIR     : MEMBER

 

                                                                                     Sd/-

                             VIJU.V.R                   : MEMBER

Be/

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.