Delhi

StateCommission

A/1089/2014

SH. HARVINDER SINGH MANCHANDA - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI BANK - Opp.Party(s)

15 Dec 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. A/1089/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/205/2012 of District Central Delhi)
 
1. SH. HARVINDER SINGH MANCHANDA
R/O T-159/D, GALI NO.10, SHUKAR BAZAR, UTTAM NAGAR, N.D.-59.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. ICICI BANK
E-BLOCK, VIDEOCON TOWER, JHANDEWALAN EXTN. N.D.-55.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI

(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

Date of Decision: 15.12.2014

FA-1089/2004

Sh. Harvinder Singh Manchanda

S/o Sh. Gurcharan Singh Manchanda

R/o T-159/D, Gali No.10

Shukar Bazar, Uttam Nagar,

New Delhi-110059

                                                                                         ….Appellant

VERSUS

ICICI Bank

Having its Registered office at

E-Block, Videocon Tower,

Jhandewalan Extension

New Delhi-110055

                                                                                     ….Respondent

 

CORAM

 

SALMA NOOR, MEMBER

N P Kaushik (Member Judicial)

 

1. Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?-Yes

2.  To be referred to the reporter or not?-Yes

 

SALMA NOOR (MEMBER)

 

  1. The appellant has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 1.10.2014 passed by the Ld. District Forum (Central), Kashmere Gate in Complaint Case No. 205/12.The District Forum vide impugned order has dismissed the complaint in complainants’ default and for non appearance.

  2. We have heard Sh. Pawan Kr. Rai, Counsel for the appellant & Ms. Sujata Piplani, Counsel for the Respondent on the appeal and perused the records.

  3. The version of the appellant for the non appearance before the District Forum on the date fixed is that the pleadings in the case was completed and the case was listed for the final hearing on the said date and the complainant was under impression that even in his absence, the case will be heard on the merits and the order will be reserved.His further submission is that he was regularly appearing before the District Forum and that was the only one date on which he could not appear before the District Forum and the case was dismissed for his non appearance.

  4. Ld. Counsel for the respondent also submits that she has also no objection if the case is remand back and be decided on merits.

  5. In view of the above submissions, we allow the appeal and set aside the order dated 1.10.2014 and remand back the case to the District Forum for deciding afresh after giving opportunity to the appellant to contest the case.The parties shall appear there on 6.2.2015.The District Forum shall proceed further in the matter in accordance with law.

  6. Appeal stand disposed of accordingly.

  7. Since the matter has been remanded back to the District Forum, the FDR, if any, deposited by the appellant/OP before this Commission be released to them after completion of due formalities.

  8. A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and also to the concerned District Forum and thereafter the file be consigned to Record Room.

 

                                        

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.