| Complaint Case No. CC/10/74 |
| | | | 1. MR RAHUL JOSHI & ORS | | 704, Primrose, Rachana Garden, Gurugovind Singh Road, Mulund Colony, Mulund West, Mumbai - 400 082. | | Mumbai. | | Maharastra | | 2. Mrs. Maya R. Joshi | | 704, Primrose, Rachana Garden, Gurugovind Singh Road, Mulund Colony, Mulund West, Mumbai - 400 082. | | Mumbai. | | Maharashtra | | 3. Mr. Harmesh R. Joshi | | 704, Primrose, Rachana Garden, Gurugovind Singh Road, Mulund Colony, Mulund West, Mumbai 400 082. | | Mumbai | | Maharashtra |
| ...........Complainant(s) | | Versus | | 1. ICICI BANK LTD & ORS | | ICICI BANK TOWER, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA EAST MUMBAI - 400 051 | | MUMBAI. | | Maharastra | | 2. United Financial Services | | C/o. S. J. Business Centre, 17/18, Islam Building, 1st Floor, 46, Veer Nariman Road, Opp. Akbarally's Fort, Mumbai 400 023. | | Mumbai. | | Maharashtra | | 3. Reserve Bank of India, Chief Gen. Mgr.-in-charge | | Department of Banking Operations & Development, Central I, 5th Floor, World Trade Centre, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400 005. | | Mumbai. | | Maharashtra | | 4. Reserve Bank of India, General Manager | | Department of Banking Supervision, Mumbai Regional Office, RBI Building 3rd & 4th Floor, Opp. Mumbai Central Railway Station, Byculla, Mumbai - 08. | | Mumbai. | | Maharashtra | | 5. Mr. S. K. Tripathi, Joint Director | | National Savings Institute, 4th Floor, CGO Complex, "A" Blcok, Seminary Hills, Nagpur - 440006 | | Nagpur | | Maharashtra | | 6. Mr. Nassir Sajjad, Regional Director, | | National Savings, East & West Insurance Building, 55, Mumbai Samachar Marg, Fort, Mumbai 400 023. | | Mumbai | | Maharashtra | | 7. Director (Budget Division) | | Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs), Government of India, North Blcok, Central Secretariat, New Delhi - 110 001. | | New Delhi. | | New Delhi | | 8. United Financial Services | | Mumbai 400 023 |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| ORDER | Per Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase, Hon'ble President Heard Mr.V.B.Kulkarni-Advocate for the complainants files an authority letter so also pursis for withdrawal of complaint and Mr.V.Mannadiar-Advocate for opponent nos.1&2. This present consumer complaint has been filed by three complainants. However, when the complaint was heard on 13/07/2010, it was noticed that the transactions which the complainants have entered with the opponents were not in the capacity of HUF but they were separate transactions and, therefore, the order was passed that the three complainants shall file separate complaints. Ld.counsel for the complainants today makes a statement that in view of the order dated 13/07/2010 three separate complaints have been filed by the present complainants. Those are complaint nos.10/173 to 10/175. Those complaints are also on Board today, however, he submits that in view of the three complaints separately filed, this composite complaint which was filed earlier is required to be withdrawn with a liberty to prosecute individual complaints. Other side advocate Mr.Mannadiar has no objection for such course. Therefore, we pass following order:- ORDER Composite complaint no.10/74 is hereby allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty to prosecute and continue complaint nos.10/173 to 10/175 individually as against the opponents. CC/10/74 stands disposed of accordingly. Copies of the order be furnished to the parties. | |
