Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

105/2011

R.Kartikeyan - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI Bank Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.Conscientia Law Association

13 Jun 2017

ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   15.04.2011

                                                                        Date of Order :   13.06.2017

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

     2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

PRESENT: THIRU. M.MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B. M.L.,                    : PRESIDENT   

                  TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                : MEMBER I   

          DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A ,D.Min.PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

C.C.NO.105/2011

        TUESDAY THIS  13^TH  DAY OF JUNE 2017

 

1. Mr. R. Karthikeyan,

Executive Director,

Skylark Information

Technologies (P) Ltd.,

“Lakshmi House”, No.42,

40 Feet Scheme Road,

Kamdhar Nagar, Mahalingapuram,

Nungambakkam,

Chennai 600 034.

 

2. Skylark Information Technologies

(P) Ltd.,

“Lakshmi House”, No.42,

40 Feet Scheme Road,

Kamdhar Nagar,

Mahalingapuram,

Chennai 600 034.                                             ..Complainants 

 

                                                  ..Vs..

1. The Credit Manager,

ICICI Bank Ltd.,

4^th Floor, Arihant Building,

Plot No.24, South Phase,

Block No.1, Ambattur Industrial Estate,

Chennai 600 058.

 

2. The ICICI Bank Limited,

Cenatoph Road Branch,

No.1, Cenetoph Road,

Chennai 600 018.                                          ..Opposite parties

 

 

For the Complainant                :   M/s. Conscientia Law Associaties.       

For the opposite parties           :   M/s. S. Namasivayam.

 

 

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. Complaint is filed seeking direction against the opposite parties  to return all the original documents and also to pay a sum of Rs.19,00,000/- towards business loss and also to pay Rs.50,000/- as compensation for mental agony and to pay cost of the complaint.

 

 Both complainant and the opposite party counsel appeared and filed a joint Comprise Memo signed by both parties stating that the matter is settled out of this forum and requested to withdraw the case.   Hence the Memo is recorded.   In view of the Memo this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.   No costs.    Comprise Memo form part of the order.

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                              PRESIDENT.