NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1545/2010

ANIL RAJ AGGARWAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI BANK LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. S. SATYANARAYANA

21 May 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1545 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 24/02/2010 in Appeal No. 12/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)
1. ANIL RAJ AGGARWALR/o. 69, G.F. Sansad Vihar, PitampuraNew DelhiDelhi ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. ICICI BANK LTD.Through its Attorney Holder, II Floor, S.D. Tower, Plot No. 7, Sector 8, RohiniNew Delhi - 110085Delhi ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :MR. S. SATYANARAYANA
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 21 May 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          Complaint filed by the petitioner had been allowed and the respondents had been directed to pay the sum of Rs.32,305/- along with interest at the rate of 10%.  Rs.5,000/- have been awarded by way of costs.

          Complainant has filed the present Revision Petition seeking compensation.  Fora below have not awarded compensation, as the petitioner has already been compensated by way of interest.

          We agree with the view taken by the fora below that it is not a case for awarding compensation in addition to the interest that has already been awarded to the complainant.  Dismissed.

 



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER